摘要
美国法定竞业禁止的公司机会理论和机会判断标准包括利益或期待标准、营业范围标准和公正标准。后又出现了混合标准,即先采用前两标准,后再采公正标准。美国约定竞业禁止历史悠久,经历了从完全否认到逐步接受的过程。英国的法定竞业禁止主要介绍了违反忠实义务和对公司机会的篡夺;德国的董事竞业禁止具有相对性,且违反董事竞业禁止的,公司具有归入权。日本的法定竞业禁止制度多承继德国法。最后台湾地区的约定竞业禁止约款的合法性审查主要是从以下三个方面:第一,审查有无值得竞业禁止约款保护的正当利益?第二,审查所限制的范围是否与雇方之正当利益保持合理的关联?第三,是否给予劳方合理的经济补偿?
The U.S. statutory corporate opportunity theory of noncompete criteria including benefits and opportunities or expect standards of business standards and standards of fairness. Then there has been mixed standard, that is, first using the first two criteria, and then adopt standards of fairness. The historic American noncompete agreement, has gone from complete de- nial to the gradual process of acceptance. Britain introduced a statutory violation of noncompete main duty of loyalty and usurpation of corporate opportunity; director of Germany＇ s noncompete relative, and in violation of noncompete directors, the company has disgorgement. Japan＇ s legal system for noncompete law is mainly inheritant of Germany. Finally agreed to review the legality of the Taiwan region noneompete covenants are mainly from the following three aspects： first, to review whether the legitimate interests of the non- competition covenants worthy of protection？ Second, the limited scope of the review are to maintain a reasonable correlation with the legiti- mate interests of the employer side？ Third, if given reasonable economic compensation to labor？
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第12期69-76,共8页
Law Science Magazine
基金
北京市教委中青年教师科研提升项目支助
关键词
美国竞业禁止
英国竞业禁止
德日董事竞业禁止
台湾竞业禁止
考察
USA Non - competition English Non - competition Germany and Japan direc- tor Non - competition Taiwan Non - competition expedition
