期刊文献+

法律英语教材评价实践 被引量:20

A probe into the evaluation criteria for law-based English textbooks
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着涉外法律事业的发展,法律专业英语教学的重要性得到高校的认同。然而高校在使用这些教材时,却普遍缺乏对教材的系统分析和评价,根本原因是缺乏一套系统评价大学法律专业英语教材的标准。笔者从需求角度入手,在分析、借鉴国内外ESP教材的评价标准的基础上,根据大学法律专业英语教材的特点,制定了一套评价该类教材的步骤和量表,为系统评价大学法律专业英语教材提供建议,旨在优化ESP教材建设,完善ESP教学。 With the rapid development of the law issues at home and abroad,the importance of law-based English teaching is recognized by the tertiary educational institutions in China. However,due to the lack of checklist for evaluating law-based English course books,systematic analysis and evaluation are not carried out before adoption. In order to provide some advice for the evaluation,a set of criteria is established and the steps for evaluation are put forward on the basis of analysis and review of literature on ESP teaching material evaluation at home and abroad. Thus,the teaching materials can be perfected and the ESP teaching can be improved.
作者 郭剑晶
出处 《外语教学理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期41-44,94-95,共4页 Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
基金 福建省教育厅社科JA12340S课题 福建江夏学院2012年教改重点资助项目J2012A013阶段性成果
关键词 法律英语教材 评价标准 评价量表 评价方法 computer-based English course book criteria checklist evaluation method
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Cunningsworth, A. 1984. Evaluating and Selecting EFL Teaching Materials. London: Heinemann. 被引量:1
  • 2Hutchinson, T. & A. Waters. 1987. English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 被引量:1
  • 3Roberts, J. T. 1996. "Demystifying Materials Evaluation". System 3. pp375 - 89. 被引量:1
  • 4Sheldon, L. E. 1988. "Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Mate- rims". English Language Teaching Journal 4. pp237 - 46. 被引量:1

同被引文献206

引证文献20

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部