期刊文献+

孤立性肺结节患者临床预测模型的对比分析 被引量:3

Comparative analysis of clinical prediction models of patients with solitary pulmonary nodule
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同孤立性肺结节(SPN)临床预测模型的运用价值。方法收集我院2012年至2013年间病理资料明确诊断的SPN患者共36例(女16例,男20例,平均年龄57±11.7岁),前瞻性评估获得的临床预测模型良、恶性判别的准确率,并与文献报道的经典临床预测模型进行比较。结果36例SPN患者中恶性17例(47.2%),良性19例(52.8%)。应用先前得到的临床预测模型预测SPN的良、恶性,其灵敏度为94.1%,特异度为68.4%,阳性预测值为72.7%,阴性预测值为92.9%;曲线下面积(AUC)为0.883±0.025,Mayo模型为0.772±0.042(P=0.005),VA模型为0.747±0.039(P=0.003);H-L检验结果提示各个临床模型的拟合均较好(P>0.05)。本临床预测模型与国外同类型模型比较差异有统计学意义,本预测模型准确率更高。结论本临床预测模型对于患者具有更高的临床价值,预测效果优于其他临床预测模型。 Objective To explore the clinical value of different clinical prediction models used in Qingyuan region for patients with solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN).Methods Continuous medical records in our hospital from 36 patients (20 men,16 women ; average age:57 ± 11.7 years old) with a definite pathologic diagnosis of SPN between 2012 to 2013 were collected to prospectively estimate the accuracy of our previous clinical prediction model on benign and malignant discrimination,and the model was also compared with two classical clinical prediction models reported in the literature.Results 47.2% (17 in 36 patients) of the nodules were malignant,and 52.8% (19 in 36 patients) were benign in this group.The accuracy of our previous model was verified with sensitivity of 94.1%,specificity of 68.4%,positive predictive value of 72.7% and negative predictive value of 92.9%.The area under the cure(AUC) for our model was 0.883 ±0.025,and 0.772 ± 0.042 in Mayo model(P =0.005 compared to our model),0.747 ± 0.039 in VA model (P =0.003 compare to our model),but there Was not significant statistical difference between Mayo model and VA model (P 〉 0.05).The H-L test showed good fitting in all models(P 〉 0.05).Overall,our model has the best precision indexed by AUC,which were statistically significant differential compared with mayo model and VA model.Conclusions Clinical prediction model that we have previously established for patients of Qingyuan region has a higher clinical value,and it's predictive effect is better than the other clinical prediction model.
出处 《中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2013年第5期47-49,共3页 Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition)
基金 清远市科技计划项目(00092641320613021)
关键词 孤立性肺结节 预测模型 对比分析 Solitary pulmonary nodule Prediction model Comparative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1Soubani AO. The evaluation and management of the solitary pulmo- nary nodule. Postgrad Med J, 2008, 84:459-466. 被引量:1
  • 2Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, et al. The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules: application to small radio- logically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med, 1997,157:849 - 855. 被引量:1
  • 3Gould MK, Ananth L, Barnett PG. A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest, 2007,131:383-388. 被引量:1
  • 4Tang AW, Moss HA, Robertson RJ. The solitary pulmonary nodule. Eur J Radiol, 2003,45:69-77. 被引量:1
  • 5Cummings SR, Lillington GA, Richard RJ. Estimating the probabili- ty of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. A Bayesian ap- proach. Am Rev Respir Dis,1986,134:449-452. 被引量:1
  • 6Gurney JW. Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pul- monary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part I. Theory. Radiology, 1993,186:405-413. 被引量:1
  • 7Erasmus JJ, Connolly JE, McAdams HP, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: Part I. Morphologic evaluation for differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. Radiographics, 2000,20:43-58. 被引量:1
  • 8Seemann MD, Seemann O, Luboldt W, et al. Differentiation of ma- lignant from benign solitary pulmonary lesions using chest radio- graphy, spiral CT and HRCT. Lung Cancer, 2000,29 : 105-124. 被引量:1
  • 9Mery CM, Pappas AN, Bueno R, et al. Relationship between a history of antecedent cancer and the probability of malignancy for a solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest, 2004,125 : 2175-2181. 被引量:1
  • 10Veronesi G BM, Spaggiari L. Low dose spiral computed tomography for early diagnosis of lung cancer : results of baseline screening in 5, 0013 high-risk volunteers. J Chn Oncol, 2006,24(Suppl) :7029. 被引量:1

共引文献55

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部