期刊文献+

“议会制英语辩论课程”的交互理据与效应——“国会议员”角色协同对思辨能力与二语习得的促进作用 被引量:6

On the Motivation and Effect of Interaction in Parliamentary English Debate Course: The Alignment Effect of Role Play of Members of Parliament on Critical Thinking and SLA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对话交互是二语/外语习得的重要机理,协同是对话交互的重要机理,协同效应的强弱深浅取决于交互主体之间的水平素质差异,差异越大协同效应越明显。为测评"议会制英语辩论"课堂中思辨能力和二语习得的协同效应,通过课堂场景下扮演"议会制"辩论模式中的"八位上议院"和"下议院议员"角色,展开国内外立法级别争议话题演说和辩论教学,对全程参与课程的41位学生采用调查问卷方式收集并用SPSS19分析统计学生评估态度方面数据。数据分析结果证明学生完全赞同或基本赞同"国会议员"角色协同对思辨能力认知、价值观塑造、思辨结构认知和二语习得方面均有较大幅度的促进作用,说明本课程能极大推进大学生外语素质的教学。 Just as interaction is to SIA/FLA, so alignment is to interaction. The effect of alignment depends on quality gaps between interacting participants, and the larger the gap, the more the effect. For the purpose of evaluating the effect of align- ment in terms of playing roles of British senators or representatives in Parliamentary Debate Course, this paper investigate the attitudes of 41 students in the course by means of questionnaire and SPSS19. The result shows that students recognized their critical thinking skills and SLA/FLA had been largely promoted, so as to prove the course a proper model to implement For- eign Language Quality Teaching for college students.
出处 《外国语文》 北大核心 2013年第4期153-157,共5页 Foreign Languages and Literature
基金 2012年教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC740034) 全国教育科学"十二五"规划2011年度教育部重点课题(GPA115071) 广东省教育科研"十一五"规划2010年度项目(2010tjk008)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 交互 协同 议员角色 思辨能力 二语 外语习得 interaction alignment role of members of parliament critical thinking SL'A/FLA
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Brookfield, S. D. Teaching for Critical Thinking[ M]. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , 2012. 被引量:1
  • 2Cottrell, S. Critical Thinking: Developing Effective Analysis and Argument [ M ]. New York: PALGRAVE Macmillan, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 3Hatfield, E. , Cacioppo J. E. dr R. Rapson. Emotional Co- tagion [ M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 被引量:1
  • 4Funder, D. Towards a Resolution of the Personality Triad: Persons, Situations, and Behaviors [J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 2006 (40). 被引量:1
  • 5Halpern, D. F. Critical Thinking: Across the Curriculum: A Brief Edition of Thought and Knowledge [ M ]. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 6Pickering, M. & S. Garrod. Toward a Mechanistic Psychol-ogy of Dialogue [ J ]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2004 (2): 27. 被引量:1
  • 7Richards, J. C. & T. S. Rodgers. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching [ M ]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2008. 被引量:1
  • 8Roche, J. M. , Dale, R. & G. Caneei. M. Doubling up on Double Meanings : Pragmatic Alignment [ J ]. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2012( 1 ) : 27. 被引量:1
  • 9National Education Goals Panel. The National Education Goals Report: Building a Nation of Learners [ M]. Washing- ton, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991. 被引量:1
  • 10何其莘,殷桐生,黄源深,刘海平.关于外语专业本科教育改革的若干意见[J].外语教学与研究,1999,31(1):25-29. 被引量:598

二级参考文献36

同被引文献43

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部