摘要
在刑事诉讼中,调查取证的方式大致可以分为两种,即"先供后证"与"先证后供"。笔者认为,在坚持程序合法和保障人权的前提下,"先供后证"与"先证后供"是相辅相成的,而不是互不相容的,但两种调查取证的方式又各有利弊。为了更好地打击犯罪,维护公平正义,本文将对这两种调查取证方式的价值与利弊从侦查的角度进行分析,以便为刑事诉讼的发展提供科学的理论依据。
In criminal procedure, there are two ways of taking evidence, confession first and taking evidence then or taking evidence first and confession then. The author thought the two ways are complementary but not incompatible under the premise of legal procedure and human rights assurance. However,the ways both have advantages and disadvantages. In order to attack crime powerfully and keep fair and just, the author analyzed the value of the two ways and advantages and disadvantages of them so as to provide scientific theoretical foundation for the development of criminal procedure.
关键词
先供后证
先证后供
理论渊源
侦查模式
confession first and taking evidence then
taking evidence first and confession then
theoretical origin
detection mode
