摘要
新闻媒体通常会使用大量的态度用语来表达其所代表的集团和党派的立场与观点。对态度用语的分析有助于揭示新闻媒体的主观倾向性。美国《华盛顿邮报》和我国的新华通讯社分别为美中的权威媒体,在中国共产党第十八次全国代表大会召开之后,两家媒体分别对其进行了报道,由于立场不同,两家媒体在报道中使用了不同的态度资源:《华盛顿邮报》的报道中否定态度用语占多数,使用了较多的、不实事求是的否定情感态度用语;而新华社报道中则较多地使用了态度系统中的评判用语,肯定态度用语居多。两家媒体的显性态度标记语都占了绝大多数,但这并不能说明二者持有相同的态度;相反,这正是二者旗帜鲜明地阐述各自观点的体现。
News media tend to use rich attitudinal markers to express their stance which usually repre- sents a particular class and party. Analyses of attitudinal language will help reveal subjectivity behind each news report. America＇ s Washington Post and China＇ s News Agency are the authoritative media voice in their own country. After the 18th Party Congress of China, these two news media made their respective reports but adopted different attitudinal resources due to their different stances： Washington Post employs more negative and prejudiced attitudinal resources negative affective expressions, while News Agency uses more judgment expressions affirmative ones ,in their reports respectively. The only similarity between the two news media turns out to be their use of high proportion of explicit attitudinal markers. However, it does not mean that they hold similar viewpoints ; instead, this shows that they both are trying to demonstrate their stance directly.
出处
《山东理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2013年第5期83-87,共5页
Journal of Shandong University of Technology（Social Sciences Edition）
基金
辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目"英语新闻语篇中的隐性作者立场与身份研究"(L11DYY044)
大连理工大学大学生创新训练项目"英语新闻报道中的作者声音表达方式研究"(201210141666)的研究成果
关键词
新闻
态度标记语
情感
评判
鉴赏
news
attitudinal markers
affection
judgment
appreciation
