摘要
美国软件开发商私人造法下的软件许可协议,试图排除首次销售原则的适用、实现区别定价、限制自身责任、扩大著作权侵权责任的范围,而在美国司法实践中,法官对软件许可协议的法律属性采用了所有权权能判断法、经济现实判断法、三部检测法等判断方式,值得我们借鉴。因与美国法律制度存在差异,在我国现行法律框架下,软件许可协议的法律属性因是否存在物质载体、是否只涉及软件运行以及软件分发模式的不同而不同,而其不同的法律属性也将导致在首次销售原则的适用、侵权责任的产生上不同的后果模式。
The software license agreements created by software developers try to exclude application of the first sale doctrine, adopt price discrimination, limit software developers＇ liabilities, and extend copyright infringement enforcement, while in the eyes of the judges of the United States, the nature of software license agreements are different when adopting different tests such as judging method of ownership, judging method of econonic reality and test of three sections. Because our legal system is different from the US laws, software licenses have varied natures according to different scenarios.
出处
《河北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第5期114-118,共5页
Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词
软件许可协议
著作权许可合同
临时复制
首次销售原则
software license agreement
copyright license agreement
temporary copy
the first sale doctrine
