摘要
出卖人的物的瑕疵担保责任在我国合同法上已经被统合进了违约责任,我国法奉行的是违约责任“单轨制”,而不是违约责任与瑕疵担保责任并存的“双轨制”。我国法上的违约责任是一个统一的概念,应当作统一的解释,不宜人为地制造分裂。解释论上主张物的瑕疵担保责任相对独立存在,是在变相地肯定“双轨制”,本身是一种叠床架屋的构造。
As to the buyer＇ s remedies for defective performance, the 1999 Contract Law of PRC does not follow the Roman model of a ＂two tier approach＂. The so called ＂warranty liabilities for defect in things＂ are unified into the liabilities for breach of contract, and the Chinese Contract Law follows a unitary approach. ＂Breach of contract＂ is a unitary concept in Chinese contract law, and it is unnecessary to complicate the matter to admit a concurrence of aedilitian remedies and liabilities for breach of contract in Chinese contract law theories.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第3期170-190,共21页
China Legal Science
