摘要
我国刑法第20条第3款设立了特殊防卫权,可以说,该条款从设立以来就一直是刑法学理论争议的焦点,对其进行研究也是有所必要的。在对特殊防卫相关理论进行简要梳理时,不难发现存在着称谓与成立条件的争论,其与一般正当防卫和防卫过当都有所区别。在此基础上对特殊防卫权的立法争议和立法价值进行了论述。当然,不可否认,特殊防卫权的立法存有缺陷,主要体现在条文用语的模糊、举证责任的不明确等,因而,有必要针对上述缺陷予以相应的完善,同时建议引进"退避原则"。
According to the 3rd section, the 20th article of the criminal law, it stipulates the special defense right. This provision has been the focus of controversy of criminal law theory since it＇s established. It＇s worthy of a detailed study. Through the analysis of general theory of special defense right, we find that there are some arguments about the title and the establishment of conditions. What＇s more, the special defense is different from the general self-defense and excessive defense. On this basis, we explained the legislation argument and the legislative value of the special defense right. Meanwhile, there is no denying of the fact that the legislation of special defense right has some defects, such as ambiguous phrase, indefinite burden of proof and so on. Therefore, this paper suggested that ＂the principle of retreat＂ should be adopted to achieve the legislative perfection.
出处
《浙江万里学院学报》
2013年第5期41-46,共6页
Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University
关键词
特殊防卫
立法争议
立法缺陷
立法完善
special defense
legislative controversy
legislative defection
legislative perfection
