摘要
见义勇为行为究竟应当界定为公法行为还是私法行为,学者们态度不一。笔者认为对见义勇为行为性质认识的不同体现着学者不同的思维模式,根源于学者对公民与公民及公民与国家之间关系认识的不同。从民法思维来看,见义勇为体现着市民社会的互助精神;而在公法角度来看,见义勇为意味着公民对国家责任的协助履行。现实生活中见义勇为者因其义举遭受的巨大损失难以在个体公民之间分担的窘境凸现了民法思维的局限。本文作者力图突破民法思维的局限,增加国家的补偿责任,从而从根本上改善见义勇为者的处境。
Scholars disagree on whether good samaritans should be defined by the private law or public law. The author holds that it origins from different perspectives. From the point of the civil law scholar, good samaritans demonstrates the spirit of mutual -help in civil society. In public law perspective, it means that the citizens have responsibility to assist the state to give reasonable assistance to those who are injured, ill, in peril. In this article, the author argued that good samaritans have two sides, it is right to consider, beyond the civil law liability, the liability of the government for compensating the loss or injury of good samaritans.
出处
《山西经济管理干部学院学报》
2013年第3期90-94,共5页
Journal of Shanxi Institute of Economic Management
关键词
见义勇为
无因管理
国家补偿责任
good samaritans
negotiorum gestio
obligations of compensation
