期刊文献+

工作场所的社会损害:一个整合性的研究框架 被引量:4

Social Undermining in the Workplace:A Integrated Research Framework
下载PDF
导出
摘要 工作场所的社会损害是个体有意阻碍他人成功的一种负向人际互动,已受到越来越多学者的关注。相关研究表明,社会损害受到侵犯者的妒忌、底线心智以及所在群体的总体社会损害水平的影响,侵犯者的核心自我评价、责任感、自尊、神经质以及社会认同和其所在团队的社会损害标准在其中起到调节作用;通过受害者的认知机制社会损害能够影响到受害者的身心健康、工作态度及绩效和反生产行为等。为了能更深入全面地理解社会损害行为,作者依据前人的研究提出了一个整合性的社会损害研究框架。该框架强调未来的研究可以从社会损害的多重后果、社会影响、组织因素等方面进一步扩展。 Social undermining refers to behavior intended to hinder, over time, the ability to establish and maintain positive interpersonal relationships, work-related success, and favorable reputation. Past inquiries have focused on social undermining's antecedents, consequences, and factors that mediate and moderate these relationships. The authors review recent progress within social undermining research and develop a new integrated research framework of social undermining. This framework highlights the multiple effects of social undermining and the roles of social contexts and organizational factors on social undermining. An agenda is provided for future studies on the multiple effects of social undermining and the social contexts and organizational factors on social undermining.
作者 夏福斌 路平
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第10期1814-1823,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71172119) 黑龙江省教育科学"十二五"规划重点课题(GBB1212045)资助
关键词 社会损害 侵犯性行为 人际互动 social undermining aggressive behavior interpersonal interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

二级参考文献132

  • 1段锦云,钟建安.组织中的进谏行为[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):69-71. 被引量:99
  • 2Padilla, A, Hogan, R, and Kaiser, R B. The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments [J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2007, 18(3): 176--194. 被引量:1
  • 3Harris, K J, Kacmar, K M, and Zivnuska, Z. An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2007, 18(3) :252--g63. 被引量:1
  • 4Einarsen, S, Aasland, M S, and Skogstad, A. Destructive leadership laehaviour: A definition and conceptual model[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2007, 18(3) : 207--216. 被引量:1
  • 5Harvey, P, Stoner, J, Hochwarter, W, and Kacmar, C. Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outeomes[J]. The Leadership Quarteriy, 2007, 18(3): 264--280. 被引量:1
  • 6Tepper, B J. Consequences of abusive supervision[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(2) : 178--190. 被引量:1
  • 7Thau, S, Bennett, R J, Mitchell, M S, and Marrs, M B. How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009, 108(1): 79--92. 被引量:1
  • 8Tepper, B J, Duffy, M K, Henle, C A, and Lambert, L S. Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and, abusive supervision[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2006, 59(1): 101--123. 被引量:1
  • 9Tepper, B J, Carr, J C, Breaux, D M, Geider, S, Hu, C, and Hua, W. Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees' workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009, 109(2) : 156-167. 被引量:1
  • 10Mitchell, M S, and Ambrose, M L. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity be liefs[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(4): 1 159--1 168. 被引量:1

共引文献87

同被引文献23

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部