期刊文献+

右室间隔部与心尖部起搏影响心功能的对比分析 被引量:3

The comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes of right ventricular septal pacing and right ventricular apical pacing on cardiac function
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析右室间隔部起搏和心尖部起搏对患者心功能的长期影响。方法连续选取高度以上房室传导阻滞患者分别行右室间隔部起搏和心尖部起搏,随访观察两组手术情况、电极参数变化、心电图、并发症、超声心动图改变。结果两组在手术时间、感知阈值、起搏阈值、QRS波宽度改变上差异有统计学意义,在电极阻抗方面差异无统计学意义;长期随访右室心尖部起搏组LVEDD、LVESD均较间隔部起搏者增加,LVEF减低。结论长期右室间隔部起搏较心尖部起搏对心功能影响更小。 Objective To compare the long-term effects of right ventricular septal pacing and right ventricu- lar apical pacing on cardiac function. Method Patients with advanced atrioventricular block undergoing right ventric- ular septal pacing or right ventricular apical pacing were consecutively selected and followed up, and electrode param- eter, electrocardiogram, echocardiography and postoperative complications were observed. Results There were statisti- cally significant differences between the two groups in the duration of operation, the threshold of perceptionand pacing, and the width of QRS wave width, no significant difference in the electrode impedance. The follow up observation showed that LVEDD and LVESD in right ventricular apical pacing group were larger,while LVEF was lower than that in right ventricular septal pacing group. Conclusion Right ventricular septal pacing seemed to better in preserving cardiac function than right apical pacing.
出处 《中国临床保健杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期465-467,I0001,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Healthcare
基金 安徽省教育厅自然科学研究课题(Kj2011z213)
关键词 心脏起搏器 人工 房室传导阻滞 超声心动描记术 Pacemaker, artificial Atrioventricular block Echocardiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Kypta A,Steinwender C, Kammler J, et al. Longterm out-comes in patients with atrioventricular block undergoingseptal ventricular lead implantation compared with stand-ard apical pacing[ J]. Europace,2008,10(5) :574-579. 被引量:1
  • 2De Cock CC,Van Campen CM,In,t Veld JA,et al. Utilityand safety of prolonged temporary transvenous pacing u-sing an activefixation lead : Comparison with a convention-al lead [ J ] . Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2003,26 ( 5 ):1245-1248. 被引量:1
  • 3Kistler PM,Kalman JM,Fynn SP,et al. Rapid decline inacute stimulation thresholds with steroid—eluting active—fixation pacing leads [ J ]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2005,28(9) :903-909. 被引量:1
  • 4de Voogt WG. Pacemaker leads:Performance and progress[J]. Am J Cardiol,1999,83(5B) :187D-91D. 被引量:1
  • 5Prinzen FW,Peschar M. Relation between the pacing in-duced sequence of activation and left ventricular pumpfunction in animals [ J ]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ,2002,25(4Ptl) :484-498. 被引量:1
  • 6Connolly SJ,Kerr CR,Gent M,et al. Effects of physiologi-cal pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of strokeand death due to cardiovascular causes [ J ]. N Engl JMed,2000,342( 19) : 1385-1391. 被引量:1
  • 7Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, et al. Mode selectiontrial in sinusnode dysfunction. Ventricular pacing or dualchamber pacing for sinus node dysfunction [J]. N Engl JMed,2002,346(24) : 1854-1862. 被引量:1
  • 8Victor F,Leclercq C,Mabo P,et al. Optimal right ventric-ular pacing site in chronically implanted patients : A pro-spective randomized crossover comparison of apical andoutflow tract pacing[ J] . J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,33(2):311-316. 被引量:1
  • 9Flevari P, Leftheriotis D, Fountoulaki K, et al. Long-termnonoutflow septal versus apical right ventricular pacing :Relation to left ventricular dyssynchrony [ J]. Pacing ClinElectrophysiol,2009,32(3) :354-362. 被引量:1

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部