期刊文献+

青年人正常及病理嗓音结果的对比性研究 被引量:3

Comparative study of normal voice parameters and vocal cord disorder cases in young peope
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 本文收集青年人正常及病理的嗓音资料 ,对其参数进行统计分析 ,掌握正常人的嗓音参数的正常值 ,并对病理嗓音结果进行对比性分析。方法 用Dr .Speech嗓音及语言分析、训练系统软件 ,采集 148例正常人及 4 37例病人嗓音资料 ,对取得的数据进行对比分析。结果 正常人频率微扰 0 .18± 0 .0 7%、振幅微扰 1.60± 0 .74 %、谐噪比 2 5.34±3.12dB、信噪比 2 5.39± 3.0 9dB、声门噪声能量 - 16.95± 3.57dB。男性基频平均值 160 .81±2 4 .2 7Hz、女性基频平均值 2 97.4 2± 35.89Hz、基频总平均值 2 0 6.35± 70 .77Hz。病理嗓音患者上述结果有不同程度的改变。结论 病理嗓音的结果示声带小结、声带息肉、声音嘶哑及单侧声带麻痹患者嗓音主要参数均有异常改变并以基频微扰、声门噪声能量最为敏感 ;男性声带麻痹 (单侧、双侧 )及男腔女调患者平均基频、最大基频、最小基频、习惯基频、基频方差均有明显提高。这些数据的取得 ,对我们评价正常及病理嗓音结果有一定的参考价值。 Objective To compare normal voice parameters and voice disorder cases. Methods The voice data of 148 healthy people and 437 vocal cord disorder patients were collected with Dr.Speech 3.0 v software. The data were compared and analyzed. Results Jitter was 0.18 ± 0.07 (%),Shimmer 1.60 ± 0.74 (%), HNR (Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio) 25.34 ± 3.12 dB, SNR(Signal-to-Noise Ratio) 25.39 ± 3.09 dB and NNE(Normalized Noise Energy) -16.95 ± 3.57 dB. The average fundamental frequency was 160.81 ± 24.27 Hz, 297.42 ± 35.89 Hz in females and 206.35±70.77Hz in all. In the voice disorder cases, the above parameters were changed in different degrees. The main voice parameters were changed in vocal nodules, polyp of the vocal cord, unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. The fundamental frequency, max frequency, min frequency, mode frequency, and SD of the fundamental frequency were increased significantly in recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (unilateral, bilateral) cases and gynecophonus cases. Conclusion The data are useful in the evaluation of voice results of normal or abnormal people.
出处 《中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志》 CAS 2000年第4期206-209,共4页 Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-skull Base Surgery
基金 广东省医学科研基金!资助 (A2 0 0 0 2 93)
关键词 语音测试 青年人 正常嗓音 病理嗓音 VOICE COMPARATIVE STUDY VOICE DISORDERS
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]Karnell MP, Hall KD, Landahl KL. Comparison of fundamental frequency and perturbation measurements among three analysis systems [J]. J Voice, 1995, 9(4): 383~393. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]Bielamowicz S, Kreiman J, Gerratt BR. Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement [J]. J Speech Hear Res, 1996, 39 (1): 126~129. 被引量:1
  • 3[3]Holmberg EB, Perkell JS, Hillman RE. Individual variation in measures of voice [J]. Phonetica, 1994, 51 (1): 30~37. 被引量:1
  • 4[3]Sodersten M, Hertegard S, Hammarberg B. Glottal closure, transglottal airflow, and voice quality in healthy middle-aged women [J]. J Voice, 1995, 9 (2): 182~197. 被引量:1
  • 5[4]Elfer MP, Fendel DM. Comparisons of jitter, shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio from directly digitized versus taped voice samples [J]. J Voice, 1995, 9 (4): 378~382. 被引量:1
  • 6[5]Omori K, Kojima H, Kakani R. Acoustic characteristics of rough voice: subharmonics[J]. J Voice, 1997, 11(1):40~7. 被引量:1

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部