摘要
欧洲人权法院对于非法证据的处理有其特色,与英美法国家迥然不同。欧洲人权法院并没有就如何排除非法证据制定系列指导性的纲要,而是采取个案中具体考量,重点考察的是公权力人员的非法取证行为是否给整个诉讼程序造成不公以及所获证据与案件的关联性,并在此基础上决定证据排除与否,这一点值得关注。
European Court of human rights has its own characteristics as for the treatment of illegal evi- dence, which is different from Anglo-American countries. European Court of human rights doesn＇ t make a se- ries of guiding outlines with reference to the exclusion of evidence obtained illegally ; however, it adopts an ap- proach of considering case-by-case, which attaches much importance to the two key factors ： the fairness of pro- cedure as a whole and the relevance of evidence. On the basis of that, the judges are determined whether the evidences obtained illegally are excluded or not, and is worthy of attention.
出处
《西南政法大学学报》
2013年第4期12-19,共8页
Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
关联性
可采性
非法证据
衍生证据
隐私权
relevance
admissibility of evidence
illegal evidence
derivative evidence
the rights of pri- vacy
