期刊文献+

辨认和控制能力与责任能力司法精神鉴定差异的调查 被引量:6

Difference between the Cognitive and Control Ability and the Responsibility in Forensic Psychiatry Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较辨认和控制能力(以下简称"辨控能力")与责任能力司法精神鉴定的差异。方法对2001年1月—2006年10月(第一时段)实施责任能力与2006年11月—2010年10月(第二时段)在刑事案件中实施辨控能力的评定结果进行比较。回访调查上述被鉴定人的法庭判决及鉴定意见的采信情况。调查公、检、法、司等法学界人士对司法精神鉴定相关问题的观点。结果两个时段的鉴定案件类型大致相仿,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但两个时段作出的精神障碍诊断类型,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。第二时段鉴定为正常范围辨控能力和部分辨控能力的人数比例较第一时段多,而完全丧失辨控能力的人数比例较第一时段少(P<0.05)。70.5%的法学界人士认为司法精神鉴定"评定辨控能力"有别于"评定刑事责任能力"。94.9%认为"作出精神病症对行为人作案行为的影响及其影响程度"或"作出辨控能力"的司法精神鉴定是符合要求的规范行为。结论评定辨控能力比评定责任能力更符合当前法学要求和自身学科的行为规范。 Objective To analyze the difference between the cognitive and control ability and the responsibility in forensic psychiatry evaluation.Methods To compare the results of the responsibility evaluation from 2001.1 to 2006.10(the first period) with that of the cognitive and control ability evaluation from 2006.11 to 2010.10(the second period).The admissibility opinions on court judgment and evaluation were investigated by return visit.The legal professions’ opinions on forensic psychiatric issues from the police office,the procuratorate,the court,and the judiciary were investigated.Results There was no significant difference of the criminal types between two periods(P0.05).There was significant difference of the diagnostic types between two periods(P0.05).The proportion of normal range and part loss of the cognitive and control ability in the second period were higher than that in the first period,but the proportion of complete loss of the cognitive and control ability in the second period was lower than that in the first period(P0.05).Among the legal professions,70.5% of them thought that "the evaluation of cognitive and control ability" was different from "the evaluation of criminal responsibility" and 94.9% of them thought that "to confirm the influence of the forensic psychiatric evaluation of mental disorder on the crime behavior" or "to assess of cognitive and control ability" met requirements of normative judicial expertise.Conclusion The evaluation of cognitive and control ability is more aligned with legal requirements and behavioral norms of own subject than the evaluation of responsibility.
出处 《法医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2013年第4期263-267,共5页 Journal of Forensic Medicine
关键词 司法精神病学 责任能力 辨认和控制能力 forensic psychiatry responsibility cognitive and control ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

共引文献1

同被引文献46

引证文献6

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部