摘要
《城乡规划法》明确了控制性详细规划在规划许可中的地位,但是并没有明确控制性详细规划就是法律文本。作为干预物权的控制性详细规划,如何处理物权保护与行政效率的矛盾是个亟待解决的问题。本文首先分析了控制性详细规划存在的问题,然后从宪法理论"公共目的、正当程序、合理补偿、法律保留"的角度,对规划权力中的严格规则和正当程序模式进行了讨论,提出对控制性详细规划应采用行政立法以及其在法制化方面应重视的问题。
The Urban and Rural Planning Law identifies the role of regulatory plan in planning permission, but it does not make clear that the regulatory plan is a legal document. How to deal with the contradiction between property right protection and administrative efficiency is the key issue in the institutional design of the regulatory plan because of its intervention in the property right. The paper first analyzes the problems met in the enforcement of the regulatory plan, and then discusses the strict rule mode and the due process mode in the planning power in terms of the constitutional principles which are ＂public aim, due process, rational compensation, and legal reservation.＂ Finally, the paper suggests that the administrative legislation should be the pattern adopted for the formulation of the regulatory plan, and that some aspects should be considered in the legalization of the regulatory plan.
出处
《城市规划》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第7期53-58,共6页
City Planning Review
关键词
控制性详细规划
规划权力
法律保留
行政立法
严格规则
正当程序
regulatory plan
planning power
legal reservation
administrative legislation
strictrule
due process
