期刊文献+

改良腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术对患者控尿能力的影响 被引量:1

Effect of improved laparoscopic techniques on ability of control urine in patients with prostate cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨改良腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术对患者控尿能力的影响.方法 96例前列腺癌患者随机分为两组,观察组51例,对照组45例.观察组采用改良腹腔镜技术,术中保护患者的尿道外括约肌,保留控尿神经和重建膀胱颈部;对照组采用常规腹腔镜技术.比较术后30 d、60d、90 d患者的控尿能力.结果 两组手术时间和术中出血量差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).两组尿管留置时间及术后30 d、60d、90 d控尿率差异有统计学意义(t=10.0359,P<0.05;t=7.9746、14.0205、10.8445,均P<0.01).结论 改良腹腔镜技术明显提高前列腺癌根治术后患者的控尿能力. Objective To study the effect of improved laparoscopic techniques on ability of control urine in patients with prostate cancer. Methods 96 patients with prostate cancer were randomly divided into two groups, the observation group (51 cases) and the control group(45 cases). The patients in the control group were operated through the conventional treatment, while the patients in the observation group were operated through the improved laparoscop- ic technique,which protected the external urethral sphincter, reserved urinary nerve and reconstructed the bladder neck. The ability to control urine for 30,60 and 90 days were compared between two groups. Results The time of op- eration and bleeding of operation had no significant differences between two groups( all P 〉 0.05 ). There were signifi- cant differences between two groups in indwelling catheter time and the ability to control urine for 30,60 and 90 days (t=10. 0359,P〈0. 05;t=7.9746,14.0205,10.8445,al! P〈0.01). Conclusion Improved laparoscopic tech- nique can improve the ability of control urine in patients with prostate cancer after operation.
作者 迟宁
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2013年第15期2273-2275,共3页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 腹腔镜 控尿能力 Prostate neoplasms Laparoscope The ability to control urine
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Lowe BA. Preservation of the anterior urethral ligarmentous at- tachments in maintaining post-prostateetomy urinary continence: A comparative study. J Urol,2007,158(2) :2137-2141. 被引量:1
  • 2Steele GS, Richie JP. Avoiding positive margins in prostate cancer surgery. Contemporary Urology,2008,69 (10) :74-93. 被引量:1
  • 3Randenborgh HV, Paul R, Bruel J, et al. Improved urinary conti- nence in radical retropubic prostectomy (Relationship with mem- branous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic reso- nance imaging. J Uro1,2009,168 ( 2 ) : 1032-1035. 被引量:1
  • 4Guillonneau B, Vallaneien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: themontsouris technique. J Urol,2005,163 (6) : 1643-1649. 被引量:1
  • 5Katz R, Saloman L, Hoznek A, et al. Positive surgical margins in laparoseopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissec- tion, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation. J Urol, 2010,169(6) :2049-2052. 被引量:1
  • 6Rassweiler J, Wagner AA, Moazin M, et al. Anatomic nerve to sparingIaparoscopic radical prostatectom y : corn parison of retro- grade and antegrade techniques. Urology,2010,55 (6) :587-592. 被引量:1
  • 7Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, et al. Comparison of transperitoneal and extrapefitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis. Eur Urol,2009,46 ( 7 ) : 312-322. 被引量:1
  • 8Poore RE, McCullough DL, Jarow JP. Puboprostatic ligament spar- ing impmves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatec- tomy. Urology,2008,51 ( 1 ) :67-72. 被引量:1
  • 9Gillitzer R, ThUrof JW. Technical advances in radical retropubic prostatectomy techniques for avoiding complications. Part I : apical dissection. BJU Int,2009,92 (2) : 172-177. 被引量:1
  • 10Saceo E,t?rayer-Galetti T,Pinto F, et al. Urinary incontinence af- ter radical prostatectomy:incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow up. BJU Int,2006,97 (6) : 1234-1241. 被引量:1

二级参考文献16

  • 1夏维木,刘定益.前列腺癌根治术进展[J].国外医学(泌尿系统分册),2004,24(5):595-599. 被引量:2
  • 2高新,邱剑光,蔡育彬,周祥福,温星桥.控尿技术在腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(3):176-179. 被引量:29
  • 3汪朔,谢立平,方丹波,夏丹,陈戈明,金晓东,王逸民,魏克湘,蔡松良.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术10例[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(6):424-426. 被引量:20
  • 4Schuessler WW,Schulam PG,Clayman RV,et al.Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:initial short-term expericence.Urology,1997,50:854-857. 被引量:1
  • 5Klotz LH,Goldenberg SL,Jewett MAS,et al.Long-term followup of a randomized trial of 0 versus 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy.J Urol,2003,170:791-794. 被引量:1
  • 6Rassweiler J,Stolzenburg J,Sulser T,et al.Laparoseopic radical prostatectomy-the experience of the German laparoscopic working group.Eur Urol,2006,49:113 -119. 被引量:1
  • 7Rozet F,Arroyo C,Cathelineau X,et al.Extraperitoneal standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.J Endourol,2004,18:605 -510. 被引量:1
  • 8Erdogru T,Teber D,Frede T,et al.Comparson of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis.Eur Urol,2004,46:312 -322. 被引量:1
  • 9Ruiz L,Salomon L,Hoznek A,et al.Comparison of early oncologie results of laparoseopic radical prostatectomy by extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach.Eur Urol,2004,46:50-56. 被引量:1
  • 10周志跃,戴玉田.保存性功能的前列腺癌根治术.见:梅骅主编.泌尿外科学[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.462-472. 被引量:2

共引文献24

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部