期刊文献+

伏立康唑与两性霉素B治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病合并侵入性真菌感染的对照研究 被引量:9

A control study of voriconazole and amphotericin B in treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia complicated with invasive fungal infections
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较伏立康唑与两性霉素B治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病合并侵入性真菌感染的疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析60例次急性淋巴细胞白血病合并侵入性真菌感染患者,治疗组给予伏立康唑注射液4mg/kg静脉滴注,1次/12h,对照组给予两性霉素B,从小剂量开始缓慢加大剂量至1mg/kg静脉滴注,1次/d,两组均于治疗后2周评价疗效及不良反应发生率。结果治疗有效率治疗组为76.67%、对照组为46.67%,对照组不良反应消化道损害、肾功能损害、低钾血症和静脉炎发生率显著高于治疗组,对照组总不良反应发生率为73.33%,高于治疗组的26.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论伏立康唑治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病合并侵入性真菌感染安全性好、疗效确切。 OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of voriconazole and amphotericin B in the treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia complicated with invasive fungal infections.METHODS A total of 60 cases of acute lymphocytic leukemia patients complicated with invasive fungal infections were retrospectively analyzed,the treatment group was treated with intravenous injection of voriconazole,4mg/kg,12 hours once,while the control group was given the intravenous injection of amphotericin B,by starting from the little dose to heavy dose,then to 1mg/kg,once daily;then the clinical efficacy and the incidence of adverse reactions of the two groups were evaluated two weeks after the treatment.RESULTS The effective rate was 76.67% in the treatment group,46.67% in the control group;the incidence of the adverse reactions,including the gastrointestinal damage,renal impairment,hypokalemia,and phlebitis,was 73.33% in the control group,significantly higher than 26.67% in the treatment group,the difference was significant(P0.05).CONCLUSION Voriconazole is safer and can achieve more accurate therapeutic effect on the treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia complicated with invasive fungal infections.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第14期3494-3495,共2页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81170520) 河南省卫生厅科研课题(2011010014)
关键词 伏立康唑 两性霉素B 侵入性真菌感染 急性淋巴细胞白血病 Voriconazole Amphotericin B Invasive fungal infection Acute lymphocytic leukemia
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献4

共引文献248

同被引文献59

  • 1邵剑峰,林茂芳,钟永根,刘忠民,傅佳萍,封蔚莹.急性白血病患者医院真菌感染的临床分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(1):29-31. 被引量:44
  • 2付秀莲,杨雪英,陈华,黄云平,李志伟.急性白血病医院感染的危险因素分析及对策[J].中国热带医学,2007,7(5):820-821. 被引量:2
  • 3血液病/恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌感染的诊断标准与治疗原则(修订版)[J].中华内科杂志,2007,46(7):607-610. 被引量:249
  • 4Kagan L, Gershkovich P, Wasan KM, et al. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of amphotericin B disposition in rats following administration of deoxycholate formulation (Fungizone (r)) : pooled analysis of published data [J]. AAPS, 2011,13 (2) : 255-264. 被引量:1
  • 5Marks DI,Pagliuca A,Kibbler CC,et al. Voriconazole versus itraeonazole for antifungal prophylaxis following allogeneie haematopoietie stem-cell transplantation[J]. Br J Haematol, 2011,155(3) 1318-327. 被引量:1
  • 6Epaulard O, Leccia MT, Blanche S, et al. Phototoxicity and photocarcinogenesis associated with voriconazole[J]. Med- Mal Infect,2011,41 (12) :639-645. 被引量:1
  • 7Yamaguchi M, Kurokawa T, Ishiyama K,et al. Efficacy and safety of micafungin as an empirical therapy for invasive fun- gal infections in patients with hematologic disorders: a multi- center, prospective study[J]. Ann Hematol, 2011,90 (10) : 1209-1217. 被引量:1
  • 8Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Formulating the problem. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions4.2.6 [ updatedSeptember2006 ; section4.http ://www.cochrane.org/ resources/handbook.htm (accessed 6th October2006). 被引量:1
  • 9Wingard JR, Carter SL, Walsh TJ, et al. Randomized, double- blind trial of fluconazole versus voriconazole for prevention of invasive fungal infection after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation [J]. Blood, 2010, 116(24) : 5111-5118. 被引量:1
  • 10Marks DI, Pagliuca A, Kibbler CC, et al. Voriconazole versus itraconazole for antifungal prophylaxis following allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation [J ]. Br J Haematol, 2011,155(3) :318-327. 被引量:1

引证文献9

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部