期刊文献+

三种弹塑性本构模型预测路基变形的对比研究 被引量:1

EVALUATION OF THREE ELASTO-PLASTIC CONSTITUTIVE MODELS BY NUMERICAL MODELING OF SOIL EMBANKMENTS
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用三种弹塑性模型——剑桥模型(MCC)、三维修正剑桥模型(3DMCC)和考虑各向异性的三维修正剑桥模型(ANIS-MCC),对一假想路堤进行快速加载下的固结变形有限元分析,以考察这三种模型预测结果的区别,为路基变形有限元分析时的本构模型的选取提供依据。研究结果表明,在路基未达到破坏状态以前,三种模型给出的路基变形、孔压消散的规律性基本一致;但当研究分析需要特别提高坡脚位置处地基变形预测精度时,最好采用较为复杂的能够反映土体各向异性屈服特性的模型,如ANIS-MCC模型。 Through the finite element analysis of an imaginary embankment under fast loading, in order to examine the difference of consolidation deformation results predicted by the three plastic-models (MCC, 3DMCC, and ANIS-MCC). The research results showed that the variation trendeney of the deformation and pore pressure were mainly the same before the destroy of the embankment, however, when it neeessicary, especially to improve the prediction accuracy of the ground deformation at foot, it was best to use the more complex model that could reflact the anisotropic yield characteristics of the soil, such as ANIS-MCC.
出处 《工业建筑》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期76-79,85,共5页 Industrial Construction
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40702051 50678130)
关键词 弹塑性 各向异性 路基 固结 有限元 elastic-plastic anisotropy subgrade consolidation FEM
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Roscoe K H,Schofield A N,Thurairajah A.Yield of Clays in States Wetter Than Critical[J],.Geotechnique,1963,13(3):211-240. 被引量:1
  • 2Roscoe K H,Burlad J B.On the Generalized Stress-Strain Behaviour of‘Wet’Clay.Engineering Plasticity[M],.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1968:535-609. 被引量:1
  • 3高彦斌..软土各向异性弹塑—粘弹塑性模型及其工程应用[D].同济大学,2004:
  • 4刘元雪,施建勇.基于应力空间变换的修正剑桥模型改进[J].岩土力学,2003,24(1):1-7. 被引量:8
  • 5高彦斌,徐超,汤竞.一个考虑土的各向异性的孔压公式及其应用[J].岩土力学,2005,26(9):1349-1355. 被引量:7
  • 6Dafalias Y F.An Anisotropic Critical State Soil Plasticity Model[J],.Mechanics Research Communications,1986,13(6):341-347. 被引量:1
  • 7Sekiguchi H,Ohta H.Introduced Anisotropy and Time Dependency in Clays,Constitutive Equations of Soils[C],//Procedings of Specialty Session9,9th ICSMFE.1977:229-238. 被引量:1
  • 8Wheeler J,Naatanen A,Karstunen M,et al.An Anisotropic Elastoplastic Model for Soft Clays[J],.Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2003,40:403-418. 被引量:1
  • 9Baudet B,Stallerbrass S.A Constitutive Model for Structured Clays[J],.Geotechnique,2004,54(4):269-278. 被引量:1
  • 10Liu M D,Carter J P.A Structured Cam Clay Model[J],.Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2002,39(6):1313-1332. 被引量:1

二级参考文献20

  • 1王引生.高速公路软土地基的沉降问题[J].中国公路学报,1993,6(1):61-66. 被引量:16
  • 2李锦坤,张清慧.应力劳台角对孔隙压力发展的影响[J].岩土工程学报,1994,16(4):17-23. 被引量:16
  • 3邓安福 张英 干腾君.重庆红粘土在不同应力路径加载下的应力应变关系[A].郑颖人等主编.第五届全国岩土力学数值分析与解析方法讨论会论文集[C].武汉: 武汉测绘大学出版社,1994.110-115. 被引量:1
  • 4刘元雪.[D].重庆:重庆后勤工程学院建筑工程系,1997. 被引量:1
  • 5Brand E W,Brenner R P. Soft Clay Engineering[M]. Amsterdam:Elserier Scientific Publishing Company,1981. 被引量:1
  • 6Dafalias Y F. Anisotropic critical state clay plasticity model[A]. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Constitutive Laws for Engineering Materials[C]. Tucson: Ariz. Elsevier N Y, 1987, 1:513-521. 被引量:1
  • 7Yamada Y, Ishihara K. Undrained deformation characteristics of loose sand under three-dimensional stress conditions[J].Soils and Foundations, 1981, 21(1): 97- 107. 被引量:1
  • 8Hunter G, Fell R. Prediction of impending failure of embankment on soft ground[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(1): 209-220. 被引量:1
  • 9魏汝龙.软粘土的强度和变形[M].北京:人民交通出版社,1991.. 被引量:3
  • 10Zdravkovic L, Potts D M, Hight D W. The effect of strength anisotropy on the behaviour of embankments on soft ground[J]. Geotechnique, 2002, 52(6): 447-457. 被引量:1

共引文献54

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部