摘要
"醉驾型"危险驾驶罪属于抽象危险犯,对"醉驾"危险状态进行形式判断,即只要"醉驾"就存在侵害法益的"危险",司法无需做出具体判断,这种机械迎合通说坚持之抽象危险犯性质的解释会得出"醉驾一律入刑"的不合理结论,无法为"醉驾一律入刑"提供出罪路径。"醉驾"的本质是因"不能安全驾驶"而威胁法益,完全没有"危险"的"醉驾"应当除罪化。因此,对"醉驾"侵犯法益的危险状态应进行独立、实质的判断,引入"不能安全驾驶"这一实质标准,进一步细化"醉驾"标准,建立分层判断机制,实现"醉驾"与"危险"判断的同步性,以合理限定"醉驾型"危险驾驶罪的犯罪圈大小。
The crime of ＂drunk driving＂ is an abstract potential damage offense. It is not a good way to adopt conceptual interpretation to define the dangerous state of ＂drunk driving＂. Even though it is adhere to the nature of the abstract potential damage offense, it turns out an unreasonable conclusion （that is, all drunk driving constitutes a crime）, and also fails to provide a decriminalization path. The essence of ＂drunk driving＂ is unsafe driving and hence threatening the protection of legal interest from criminal law. Therefore, the dangerous state caused by infringement of legal interests should be determined by conducting independent and substantive judgments. Through the introduction of the substantial standard of ＂unsafe driving＂ and the refinement of the standard of ＂drunk driving＂, we should realize the synchronized judgment of ＂drunk driving＂ and its dangerous state, by establishing a hierarchical judgment mechanism, so that the crime scope of dangerous driving caused by ＂ drunk driving＂ can be reasonably limited.
出处
《河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2013年第2期47-53,70,共8页
Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
关键词
“醉驾”
抽象危险犯
形式判断
实质判断
驾驶能力
＂drunk driving＂
abstract potential damage offense
conceptual judgement
substantive judgment
driving ability
