期刊文献+

田野调研:布局、论证、发现、转换与交叉 被引量:3

Fieldwork Investigation:Design,Argumentation,Discovery,Transformation and Intersection
原文传递
导出
摘要 现代人类学的田野调研,古今文献不可或缺,经由专业分析和现场判定得出新鲜的文化诠释,是人类学的擅长。田野实践的方法论选择是首要的,它决定了诠释与应用的根本方向;整体性原则与多样性文化思考还是人类学应用性实践的重要认识论根据。谈到田野工作的具体方法,特别是团队式的田野调研往往需要先行设计,长时段的规划与合作,是集思广益获得递进性重大结论的前提。人类学史上连续展示的理论与方法,并不是为了挪用和套用,而是协助人们在新的田野考察中实现思想的转换(所谓悟性),得以论证、展示与实现理论创新。 Literature of both ancient and contemporary times are indispen-sable for modern anthropological fieldwork investigation. Anthropologists are experts in obtaining new cultural interpretation through professional analysis and on-site judgment. The choice of methodology is of primary importance in field-work as it determines the basic orientation of interpretation and application. As to applied practice in anthropology, the principle of holisticity and that of cultural diversity are considered to be the foundation of significant epistemology. When it comes to specific methods, in particular with teamwork, fieldwork often requires preliminary designing, long-term planning and cooperation to put heads together and draw conclusions progressively. All the theories and methods continuously a-dopted in the history of anthropology are helpful for us to convert thoughts in new fieldwork investigations so that theory can be proved and innovated.
出处 《广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期2-8,共7页 JOURNAL OF GUANGXI MINZU UNIVERSITY:PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION
关键词 田野-文献研究 方法论与方法 文化诠释 应用性实践 转换 创新 fieldwork and literature research methodology and methods cultural interpretation applied practice transformation innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献189

共引文献198

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部