期刊文献+

对构式语法八大弱点的诟病 被引量:15

Eight Faults in Construction Grammar
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对构式语法进行了尝试性的吹毛求疵,指出其八大弱点:1)派别林立,观点不一;2)观点不清;3)过分强调构式的单层面性和独立性;4)过分强调语法系统的开放性;5)过度夸大语法和语义的关联性;6)无法解释一个具体实体构式的跨语言差异;7)构式语法的原则有过于绝对之嫌;8)构式语法的"语用"属姑且用之的"权宜语用"。最后指出构式语法的前景在于构式语法的内外互补。 This thesis tries to find faults with construction grammar,boiling down to eight weaknesses:a) inagreeable ideas among the various schools of thought;b) unclear formulation;c) overstress of monostratality and independency of constructions;d) overstress of the openness of grammar systems;e) overstress of the semantico-grammar relevance;f) inability to account for interlingual differences of the same one substantive construction;g) absoluteness of the various principles;and h) momentary expediency of its 'pragmatics'.Finally the paper envisages the vista of construction grammar,vista of internal and external complementarity.
作者 侯国金
出处 《外语研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期1-12,112,共12页 Foreign Languages Research
基金 四川外语学院和国家社科项目"语用翻译学:寓意言谈翻译研究"(sisu201209 12BYY017) 教育部社科项目"词汇-构式语用学:语用翻译学的第一座桥"(12XJA740008)的前期成果
关键词 构式语法 诟病 构式 互补 语用 construction grammar weaknesses construction complementarity pragmatics
  • 相关文献

参考文献63

  • 1Bybee, J. et al. 1994. Evolution of Grammar [C],Chicago : University of Chicago Press. 被引量:1
  • 2Chalker, S. &- E. Weiner. 1996. The OxfordDictionary of English Grammar [Z]. NY: OUP. 被引量:1
  • 3Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar\Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective [M].Oxford &- NY: OUP. 被引量:1
  • 4Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics[M]. Cambridge: CUP. 被引量:1
  • 5Fillmore, C. J. 1988. The mechanisms of wConstructionGrammarM [J], Bulletin of the Linguistic Society 14:35 - 55. 被引量:1
  • 6Fillmore * C. J. 1999. Inversion and constructionalinheritance [C] // G, Wibelhuth et al. Lexical andConstructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation,Stanford : CSLI Publications. 113 - 128. 被引量:1
  • 7Fried, M. H. Boas. 2005. Grammatical Construction :Back to the Roots [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 被引量:1
  • 8Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions: A ConstructionApproach to Argument Structure [M], Chicago:University of Chicago Press. 被引量:1
  • 9Goldberg, A. E. 1997. The relationships between verbsand constructions [C3 // M. Verspoor et al. Lexicaland Syntactical Constructions and the Constructionof Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 383 - 398. 被引量:1
  • 10Goldberg, A. E. 2003. Constructions: A newtheoretical approach to language C J Trends inCognitive Sciences 7(5) : 219 — 224. 被引量:1

二级参考文献406

共引文献1635

同被引文献179

引证文献15

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部