期刊文献+

教育对非农就业工资收入不平等的解释研究 被引量:1

Research on Interpretation of Non-agricultural Income Inequality from Perspective of Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于分位数回归方法和1989-2009年CHNS的入户数据,根据明瑟方程的回归结果显示,低收入组的教育收益率高于高收入组的教育收益率。通过重新构建的工资不平等程度度量变量和教育不平等以及经验差异度量变量,对离差模型的分位数回归结果显示虽然教育能够提高低收入群体的工资收入,但是教育差距并不能很好地解释收入不平等的扩大。 Based on the quantile regression method and households survey data provided by China Health and Nutrition Survey(CHNS) from 1989 to 2009,the regression results obtained with the Mincer-type equation show that the earning rate of education for low income groups is higher than that for high income groups.Through reconstructed income inequality degree measurement variables,education inequality and experience differences measurement variables,the quantile regression results from deviation model show that education helps improve the wages of low income groups,but education difference can not account for increasing income inequality.
作者 方宇惟
出处 《创新》 2013年第3期49-53,127,共5页 Innovation
关键词 非农就业 工资不平等 教育收益率 分位数回归 non-agricultural income income inequality earning rate of education quantile regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献51

共引文献371

同被引文献16

  • 1罗楚亮.城镇居民教育收益率及其分布特征[J].经济研究,2007,42(6):119-130. 被引量:137
  • 2Psacharopoulos, G. and H. A. Patrinos. Returns to investment in education: a further update [ J]. Educa-tion Economics, 2004. 12(2) : 111 - 134. 被引量:1
  • 3Psacharopoulos, G. Returns to Education: A Further International Update and Implications [ J] . The Journalof Human Resources, 1985. 20(4) : 583 -604. 被引量:1
  • 4Qian, Xiaolei. and R. Smyth. Private returns to investment in education: an empirical study of urban China[J]. Post - Communist Economies, 2008. 20(4) : 483 -501. 被引量:1
  • 5Knight, J. and L. Song. Increasing urban wage inequality in China [ J]. Economics of Transition, 2003. 11(4): 597 -619. 被引量:1
  • 6Brauw, A. d. and S. Rozelle.中国农村非农就业教育回报率的一致性[J].中国劳动经济学,2009,(1): 3-18. 被引量:1
  • 7Chen, G. and S. Hamori. Economic returns to schooling in urban China: OLS and the instrumental varia-bles approach [ J]. China Economic Review, 2009. 20(2) ; 143 - 152. 被引量:1
  • 8Maurer - Fazio, M. Earnings and education in China transition to a market economy Survey evidence from1989 and 1992 [J]. China Economic Review, 1999. 10(1) : 17 -40. 被引量:1
  • 9Kara, 0. Comparing two approaches to the rate of return to investment in education [ J] . Education Eco-nomics, 2010. 18(2) ; 153 -165. 被引量:1
  • 10宁光杰.教育扩张能改善收入分配差距吗?——来自CHNS2006年数据的证据[J].世界经济文汇,2009(1):1-14. 被引量:23

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部