期刊文献+

间隔学习与测试对学习判断的影响 被引量:8

Spaced Learning and Testing on Judgment of Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章以90名大学生为被试,通过两个学习判断的实验,研究间隔学习和测试效应对即刻学习判断及其准确性的影响,结果表明:(1)间隔学习促进记忆保持力,降低即刻学习判断中对困难学习材料的高估并提高学习判断相对准确性。(2)重学前预测试具有增强记忆痕迹的功能,在间隔学习的基础上显著提高了学习判断相对准确性。(3)外部线索应当区分,间隔学习和预测试属于不同的外部线索。 Judgment of learning (JOL) is an important form of metamemory monitoring judgment, which is a predictability judgment of recollection in the later recall test completed by the individuals after learning. How to improve the accuracy of JOL is one of the core contents of the JOL studies. Many factors affect JOL and the accuracy of JOL, including the intrinsic clues, the extrinsic clues, and the mnemonics clues. Among these, certain learning conditions, such as spaced learning and testing, are extrinsic factors that can be easily manipulated. They can make a critical impact on the memory and metamemory. The study included two experimental designs in order to improve the memory effect and metamemory monitoring accuracy. Experiment 1 took the form of two - factorial mixed design, investigating the effect of spaced learning made on JOL and the accuracy of JOL, massed learning as a reference. Experiment 2 was a two - factorial mixed design. Based on the spaced learning effect of Experiment 1, Experiment 2 utilized the test effect and explored how spaced learning with the test impacts the judgement of learning and the accuracy of JOL. The results showed that, a) the spaced learning significantly improved recall performance, reduced the over confidence in immediate judgment of learning and improve the accuracy of JOL for difficuh items; b) testing before repetitive learning enhanced memory traces and significantly improved the relative accuracy of JOL based on spaced learning; and c) different extrinsic clues should be distinguished, such as spaced learning and pre -test.
作者 张振新 明文
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期663-668,共6页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 教育部重点课题(DBA110182) 教育部人文社科规划基金项目(11YJA880161)资助
关键词 间隔学习 测试 学习判断 spaced learning, testing, judgment of learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1陈功香,傅小兰.学习判断及其准确性[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(2):176-184. 被引量:58
  • 2贾宁.延迟学习判断研究的发展与展望[J].心理科学,2012,35(1):62-69. 被引量:5
  • 3张锦坤,白学军,杨丽娴.国外关于测试效应的研究概述[J].心理科学进展,2008,16(4):661-670. 被引量:27
  • 4张锦坤,杨丽娴.测试效应:致力于有效学习的一项基础研究[J].心理科学,2011,34(5):1101-1105. 被引量:14
  • 5Cepeda, N. J.,Pashler, H.,Vul, E.,Wixted, J. T. , & Rohrer, D.(2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks : A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin,132(3),354 -380. 被引量:1
  • 6Dunlosky, J.,& Nelson, T. 0. (1994 ). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning ( JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545 -565. 被引量:1
  • 7Dunlosky, J.,& Nelson, T. 0. ( 1997). Similarity between the cue for judgments of learning ( JOL) and the cue for test is not the primary determinant of JOL accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language,36, 34 -49. 被引量:1
  • 8Janiszewski, C.,Noel, H.,& Sawyer, A. G. (2003). A meta - analysis of the spacing effect in verbal learning: Implications for research on advertising repetition and consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research’ 30(1) , 138 - 149. 被引量:1
  • 9Koriat,A. ( 1997). Monitoring one^ own knowledge during study : A cue -utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4) , 349 -70. 被引量:1
  • 10Koriat, A.,& Bjork, R. A. (2006) . Mending metacognitive illusions : A comparison of mnemonic - based and theory - based procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning,Memory,and Cognition, 32(5), 1133 -1145. 被引量:1

二级参考文献136

  • 1任建胜.素质教育与考试[J].教育研究,1998,19(7):64-68. 被引量:28
  • 2沈大为,韩凯.FOK判断与可接近信息之间的关系[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):320-327. 被引量:9
  • 3沈德立,白学军.高效率学习的心理机制研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):2-6. 被引量:83
  • 4贾宁,白学军,沈德立.学习判断准确性的研究方法[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(3):103-109. 被引量:22
  • 5[1]Dunlosky J, Nelson T O. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOLs) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 1992, 20: 373~380 被引量:1
  • 6[2]Shaw R J, Craik F I M. Age differences in performance on a cue recall task. Psychology and Aging, 1989, 4 (2): 131~135 被引量:1
  • 7[3]Carroll M, Nelson T O, Kirwan A. Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: Differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention. Acta Psychologica, 1997, 95: 239~253 被引量:1
  • 8[4]Koriat A. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgment of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1997, 126: 349~370 被引量:1
  • 9[5]Koriat A. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 1993, 100: 609~639 被引量:1
  • 10[6]Koriat A. Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1995, 124: 311~333 被引量:1

共引文献95

同被引文献74

引证文献8

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部