摘要
审视当下中国的微博交往,学界应以马克思的精神交往理论为指导来分析其"理性交往"的现实性;而哈贝马斯构想的"主体间性"和"理性共识"原则,则可以为研究者提供认知向度和理论参照。微博因其优于其他媒体的自由对话特性,正在成为当代中国重要的交往理性试验区;而存在重大冲突和非合理性的系统与生活世界、主体性与理性迷失的交往主体以及微博传播内在化的冲突等因素,共同滋生出了浮躁的微博交往行为。权力、资本以及传统文化价值观施加的深层次压力,使得初具公共领域特征的微博极可能丧失对话的功能。因此,哈贝马斯所言的交往理性能否在微博领域得到呈现,仍值得怀疑。学界需要重塑生活世界的合理性,以此建构理性交往和价值共识的社会基础。
Marxist theories of spiritual communication and the principles of communicative rationality and rational consensus proposed by Habermas provide cognitive dimensions and theoretical basis for the survey of microblog contacts in China at present. Microblog is superior to other media because of its feature of free conversation. It is becoming an important pilot area for communicative rationality in China. However, different factors such as a system with major conflicts and irrational elements, association of subjects without subjectivity and reasons, and the conflict of the internalization of blog communication are breeding blundering communicative actions in microblog. Power, capital and the heavy pressure exerted by traditional cultural values make mieroblog, which initially has the character of Public Sphere, easily lose the function of the conversation. Therefore, it is still doubtful that whether Habermas＇ theory of communicative rationality will be applicable in mieroblog area. We need to reshape the rationality of the world to construct the social foundation with rational communication and common values.
出处
《西南交通大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2013年第3期36-44,共9页
Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
基金
上海市高等教育内涵建设085工程子项目
关键词
微博
交往理性
主体间性
公共领域
Mircoblog
communicative rationality
subjectivity
Public Sphere
