期刊文献+

基于自身短期与社会长远利益两难选择的绿色消费机制 被引量:19

The Mechanisms of Green Consumption Based on the Dilemma between Short-term Individual and Long-term Social Interests
下载PDF
导出
摘要 环境恶化及消费对环境的巨大影响,使得顾客进行绿色消费的意义重大而深远。企业希望能够掌握绿色消费的特点和机制,从而能够拉动绿色需求。绿色营销研究多针对企业,而针对顾客的研究甚少。为数不多的绿色消费研究甚少关注顾客在进行绿色消费时在自身短期利益与社会长远利益之间的两难选择,对绿色消费机制的研究也很缺乏。本研究试图从该两难选择入手,使用自我控制、利他行为、自我构建等理论,采用实验方法,从顾客的视角来研究个体因素、文化因素与情境因素是如何通过影响"关注长远利益"、"关注社会利益",从而影响绿色消费的,并研究这两种机制的边界条件、冲突及自我构建对自身短期利益与社会长远利益两难选择的调和。 Environmental degradation and the enormous impact of consumption on the environment make customers' green consumption significant and important for the future. Companies want to be able to understand the characteristics and mechanisms of green consumption, which can boost green demand. While green marketing research mainly focuses on companies, the research on customers is limited. Little green consumption research pays attention to the customers' dilemma between short-term individual interests and long-term social interests during the consumption of green products, so does the research on the mechanisms of green consumption. This study attempts to focus on the dilemma, applying theories of self-control, altruistic behavior and self-construction, as well as using experimental methods to investigate how the three factors (individual, cultural and situational) influence "concerns about the long-term interests" and "concerns about the social interests", thus affecting green consumption from customers' perspective. The study is also on the boundary conditions of and conflict between these two mechanisms and the reconciliation of self-construction to the dilemma.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期775-784,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71202009 7110203271272026) 天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目(TJGL10-881)资助
关键词 顾客 绿色消费 自我控制 利他行为 自我构建 customers green consumption self control altruistic behavior self construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1董春艳,郑毓煌.消费者自我控制:文献评述与研究展望[J].经济管理,2010,36(11):170-177. 被引量:14
  • 2徐惊蛰,谢晓非.解释水平视角下的自己-他人决策差异[J].心理学报,2011,43(1):11-20. 被引量:93
  • 3姚琦,乐国安.动机理论的新发展:调节定向理论[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(6):1264-1273. 被引量:87
  • 4Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). "I" seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33-49. 被引量:1
  • 5Aggarwal, P., & Law, S. (2005). Role of relationship norms in processing brand information. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 453-464. 被引量:1
  • 6Aggarwal, P., & Zhang, M. (2006). The moderating effect of relationship norm salience on consumers' loss aversion. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 413-419. 被引量:1
  • 7Allen, J. B., & Ferrand, J. L. (1999). Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and proenvironmental behavior: A test of Geller's actively caring hypothesis. Environment and Behavior, 31(3), 338-353. 被引量:1
  • 8Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351-355. 被引量:1
  • 9Brown, J. D. (1998). The self. USA: McGraw-Hill. 被引量:1
  • 10Clark, M. S., & Mils, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 684-691. 被引量:1

二级参考文献78

  • 1Sengupta, J., & Zhou, R. (2007). Understanding impulsive eaters' choice behaviors: the motivational influences of regulatory focus. Journal of Marketing Research,44,297-308. 被引量:1
  • 2Shah, J. Y., Brazy, P. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Promoting us or preventing them: Regulatory focus and manifestations of intergroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 433-446. 被引量:1
  • 3Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy X value effects: Regulatory focus as a determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 447-458. 被引量:1
  • 4Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 693-705. 被引量:1
  • 5Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A., Y. (2001). "I" seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 33-49. 被引量:1
  • 6Amodio, D. M., Shah, J. Y., Sigelman, J., Brazy, P. C., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2004). Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 225-232. 被引量:1
  • 7Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey, G., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Tactical differences in coping with rejection sensitivity: the role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 435-448. 被引量:1
  • 8Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory focus Theory: implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 86, 35-66. 被引量:1
  • 9Broekner, J., Paruchuri, S., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Regulatory focus and the probability estimates of conjunctive and disjunctive events. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 5-24. 被引量:1
  • 10Summerville, A., & Roese, N. J. (2008). Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: A cautionary note. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 247-254. 被引量:1

共引文献187

同被引文献194

引证文献19

二级引证文献119

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部