期刊文献+

家族企业、控股股东与股权激励——以自利性假说和道德风险假说为基础 被引量:6

Family Enterprise,Controlling Shareholders and Equity Incentive Plan——Based on Self-interesting Hypothesis and Moral Risk Hypothesis
原文传递
导出
摘要 以2005~2011年公布股权激励计划的152家家族企业上市公司为样本进行研究,根据管理层自利性假说和道德风险假说分析我国家族企业控股股东持股比例对股权激励计划定位与效果的影响。实证结果表明,家族企业上市公司控股股东为了避免管理层可能出现的道德风险而实施股权激励,但控股股东持股比例会影响股权激励给予的股权数量;家族内部的股权结构会影响实际控股股东对股权激励计划的影响,控股股东也会影响股权激励实施的后果。 According to the management self-interesting hypothesis and moral risk hypothesis,this paper analyzes the effect of Chinese family enterprise company shareholders on the positioning and economic consequence of equity incentive plan based on the sample of 152 family enterprises listed companies which issued equity incentive plan during 2005-2011.The empirical results show that the controlling shareholders of family enterprise listed companies will implement equity incentive in order to avoid possible management moral risk.But shareholder's holding will affect the number of equity in equity incentive plan.And the ownership structure within the family will affect the influence of actual controlling shareholders on the equity incentive plan.And the controlling shareholders can also affect the implementation consequences of the equity incentive.
作者 巩娜
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期94-102,共9页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"股权激励契约结构 管理层决策与公司价值"(71102013) 国家自然科学基金项目"我国企业集团内部资本市场的形成机制和经济后果研究"(71172017) 教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(09YJA630099) 上海市教委创新项目<后金融危机时代我国上市公司股权激励行为分析>(12YS156) 上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金<制度变迁 会计信息质量与股权激励计划关系研究>(slx10003)
关键词 家族企业 控股股东股权激励 定位与效果 family enterprise controlling shareholders incentive plan positioning and economic consequence
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1AIi,A., Tai-Yuan Chen, S. Radhakrishnan. Corporate Disclosures by Family Firms [J ]. Journal of Accounting and Eco- nomics,2007,44:238-286. 被引量:1
  • 2Amihud, Yakov ,and Baruch Lev. Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers[ J ]. Bell Journal of E- conomics, 1981,12:605 -617. 被引量:1
  • 3Anderson, M., Banker, R., Ravindran, S. Executive com- pensation in the information technology industry [J ]. Management Science ,2000,46:530-547. 被引量:1
  • 4Anderson,R "C', and Reeb,D "M. Founding Family Ownership and Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 [J]. Journal of Finance,2003,58:1301-1327. 被引量:1
  • 5Armstrong, Christopher S., Rahul Vashishtha .Executive stock options, differential risk-taking incentives, and firm value [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics,2012,104:70-88. 被引量:1
  • 6Arya, A., Brian Mittendorf. Offering stock options to gauge managerial talent [J ]. Journal of Accounting and Eco- nomics, 2005,40:189-210. 被引量:1
  • 7Baber, W.R.,Patricia M. Fairfield and James A. Haggard. The Effect of concern about Reported Income on Discretionary Spending Decisions: The Case of Research and Development [J]. The Accounting Review, 1991,66:818-829. 被引量:1
  • 8Balkin, D.B., G.D. Markman. Is CEO pay in high-tech- nology firms related to innovation? [ J ]. Academy of management, 2000,43:1118-1129. 被引量:1
  • 9Barker, V. L., and George C. Mueller.CEO Characteris- tics and Finn R&D Spending [J]. Management Science ,2002,48: 782-801. 被引量:1
  • 10Berle, A., Means, G. The Modern Corporation and Pri- vate Property [M. Harcourt, Brace, & World,New York, NY, 1932. 被引量:1

同被引文献99

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部