期刊文献+

缘何大股东会认购定向增发股份? 被引量:9

Why will the Controlling Shareholders Describe the Private Replacement Stocks?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以2006-2010年上市公司定向增发为研究样本,系统考察了大股东参与定向增发的动因及市场影响。实证结果表明:上市公司未来增长前景越好,大股东认购比例越高;市场对大股东参与定向增发的行为能够作出解读,对于大股东认购比例高的公司,市场正向反应越大。但定向增发这种歧视性的融资交易行为稀释了上市公司中小股东权益,侵害了公众投资者利益。本研究不仅有助于理解在股权集中之下不同利益主体的融资交易行为,还对未来市场的监管和市场有效投资决策提供了有益的思路。 Based on the sample in listed companies issuing private securities in China stock market from 2006 to 2010, this article examines controlling shareholders' behavior in the private placement and its market reaction. The result indicates that if controlling shareholders believe a higher profitability in the future, they will be willing to subscribe more stocks. The market can perceive information conveyed by controlling shareholders' behavior, and the stock price will react positively to firm a higher subscription rate. However, the private placement as a financial transaction is a kind of discrimination, which dilutes the minority shareholders' benefit, violating the public investors' interest. This study will not only help to understand the financing behavior of the different stakeholders under the ownership concentration, but also help to regulate the market and make the efficient investment decision in the future.
作者 郭思永
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期55-61,共7页 Securities Market Herald
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"投资者保护 定向增发和财富转移问题综合研究"(项目编号:10CGL040) 国家自然科学基金项目"我国企业集团内部资本市场的形成机制和经济后果研究"(项目编号:71172017) 上海市教委重点学科基金资助项目"会计学"(项目编号:J51701) 上海市教育委员会"教师专业发展工程"(2011年)的项目资助
关键词 定向增发 大股东 市场反应 财富转移 private placement, controlling shareholder, market reaction, transfer of wealth
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Baek, J.-S., J.-K. Kang, I. Lee. Business Groups and Tunneling: Evidence fi'om Private Securities Offerings by Korean Chaebols[J]. Journal of Finance, 2006, 61 (5): 2415-2449. 被引量:1
  • 2Barclay, M. J., C. G. Holdemess, D. P. Sheehan. Private Placements and Managerial EntrenchmentlJ]. Jonrnal of Corporate Finance, 2007, 13(4): 461-484. 被引量:1
  • 3Chen, K. C. W., H. Yuan. Earnings Management and Capital Resource Allocation: Evidence from China's Accounting-Based Regulation of R.ights Issues[J]. The Accounting Review, 2004, 79(3): 645- 665. 被引量:1
  • 4Cronqvist, H., M. Nilsson. The choice between rights offerings and private equity placements[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2005, 78(2): 375-407. 被引量:1
  • 5Eckbo, B. E., P-. W. Masulis. Adverse selection and the rights offer paradox[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1992, 32(3): 293-332. 被引量:1
  • 6Espen, E. B., Zonald W. Masulis, . Norli. Security Offerings[M]. Vol. Volume 1: Empirical Corporate Finance. Netherlands: North- HoUand, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 7Johnson, S., P. Boone, A. Breach, E. Friedman. Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2010, 58(1-2): 141-186. 被引量:1
  • 8Johnson, S., R. L. Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer. Tunneling[J]. The American Econonfic Review, 2000, 90(2): 22-27. 被引量:1
  • 9King, B. F. Market and Industry Factors in Stock Price Behavior[J]. The Journal of Business, 1966, 39(l): 139-190. 被引量:1
  • 10Slovin, M. B., M. E. Sushka, K. W. L. Lai. Alternative flotation methods, adverse selection, and ownership structure: evidence from seasoned equity issuance in the U.K[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2(100, 57(2): 157-190. 被引量:1

二级参考文献186

共引文献684

同被引文献111

引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部