期刊文献+

基于LOPA与轨迹交叉理论的系统安全性 被引量:5

Study on system safety based on LOPA and track cross theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过将轨迹交叉理论与LOPA分析法2种方法相结合,建立了基于轨迹交叉论和LOPA的分析事故模型,对系统的安全状况进行分析评价.即应用轨迹交叉理论将系统分为人-物2条事件链,再运用LOPA分析事件IPL的PFD,判断其风险等级,以决定是否应该增加安全措施,从而提高系统的安全性.最后通过一个化工工艺流程危险性分析实例说明LOPA在事故分析模型中的作用.结果表明:LOPA与轨迹交叉理论从功能上达到互补的作用,能更为准确的找出风险较高的设备或行为,从而决定是否应该增加减少风险的安全措施. This paper combines track cross theory with LOPA analysis to analyze the status quo of the security of the system evaluation, which is based on track LOPA theory and the analysis of the cross accident model. These theories are cross track application system which is divided into two things, the chain of events and the use of LOPA analysis events of the PFD in IPL. These methods can judge the risk level and make sure of increasing the safety measures so as to improve the security of the system. Finally, an example of chemical process hazard analysis is given to illustrate LOPA' s function played in the analysis of the model. Result indicates that LOPA and track cross theory can achieve the complementary purpose from the function. It can find out the high risk equipment or behavior more accurately, so as to decide whether it should increase the safety measures to reduce the risk.
作者 邓彬 施式亮
出处 《矿业工程研究》 2013年第1期62-66,共5页 Mineral Engineering Research
关键词 轨迹交叉论 保护层分析(LOPA) 风险等级 独立保护层(IPL) 保护失效概率(PFD) Track cross theory layer of protection analysis (LOPA) risk level Independent protection layer (IPL) probability of failure on demand(PED)
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献13

  • 1卢卫,王延平.保护层分析方法[J].安全、健康和环境,2006,6(4):32-34. 被引量:23
  • 2国家安全生产监督管理局.安全评价(第三版)[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2005:438-457. 被引量:1
  • 3Bingham, K. ,G. P. Integrating. H AZOP and SIL/LOPA Analysis: Best practice recommendations[J]. The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society ,2004,10(2) : 56 - 66. 被引量:1
  • 4Dowell A M. Layer of protection analysis for determining safety integrity level[J]. ISA Transactions, 1998,37(3) :155 - 165. 被引量:1
  • 5Wei C Y, Rogers W J, Mannan M S. Layer of proction analysis for reactive chemical risk assessment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials ,2008,159( 1 ) : 19 - 24. 被引量:1
  • 6Gowland R. The accidental risk assessment methodology for industries (ARAMIS)/layer of protection analysis (LOPA) methodology: A step forward towards convergent practices in risk assessment?[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006,130(3) :307 - 310. 被引量:1
  • 7CCPS. Layer of Protection Analysis-Simplified Process Risk Assessment[M]. New York: Wiley,2001. 被引量:1
  • 8Summers A E. Introduction to layers of proction analysis[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials ,2003,104(1-3): 163 -168. 被引量:1
  • 9CCPS. Guidelines for Pressure Relief and Effluent Handling Systems[M]. New York:Wiley, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 10魏华.安全设计的保护层分析在600kt/a甲醇项目中的应用[J].石油化工自动化,2008,44(6):24-27. 被引量:6

共引文献78

同被引文献41

  • 1谷志宇,帅健,董绍华.应用API581对输气站场进行定量风险评价[J].天然气工业,2006,26(5):111-114. 被引量:31
  • 2田水承,李红霞,王莉,陈婷.从三类危险源理论看煤矿事故的频发[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(1):10-15. 被引量:87
  • 3罗春红,谢贤平.事故致因理论的比较分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2007,3(5):111-115. 被引量:90
  • 4Center for chemical process safety. Layer of protection analysis-sim- plified process risk assessment [ M ]. New York : American Institute of Chemical Engineers,2001. 被引量:1
  • 5Application of safety instrumented for the process industries [ S ]. ANSI/ISA S1.01,1996. 被引量:1
  • 6Functional safety in the process industry-guidance for the determi- nation of the required safety integrity levels [ S ]. IEC 61511,2004. 被引量:1
  • 7Trammell S, Lorenzo D, Dd:vis B. Integrated hazards analysis:Using the strengths of multiple methods to maximize effectiveness [ C ]// ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exposition, Den- ver, Colorado, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 8Markowski A S, Mannan M S. Exsys-LOPA for the chemical process industry[ J]. Joumal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010,23(6) :688 -696. 被引量:1
  • 9Summers Angela, Vogtmann Willian, Smolen Steven. Improving PHA/LOPA by consistent consequence severity estimation[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2011,24 (6) : 879 - 885. 被引量:1
  • 10Baybutt Paul. Layers of protection analysis for human factors(LOPA-HF) [ J ]. Process Safety Progress, 2002,21 ( 2 ) : 119 - 129. 被引量:1

引证文献5

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部