摘要
清代文献没有直诉之名,多见的是叩阍、京控、上控。当代的研究并没有加以细致分析,甚至讲:"叩阍,又称京控,俗称告御状"。不但将京控纳入直诉来论述,而且不加区别,其误解是明显的。因为《清史稿·刑法志三》将京控与叩阍分别定义,而且京控与叩阍的审理程序也不相同,本文就这个问题,从审理程序及量刑定罪方面展开论述,并且通过叩阍、京控、上控案件的审理过程,分析其中的不同,以期在更正前讹的基础上,重新认识京控与叩阍的问题。
There are no definite expressions of direct appeal in the literatures in Qing Dynasty, mon are Kouhun （ 叩阍 , going to the royal court to complain about one＇s grievance）, Jingkong the most corn- （ 京控, going to the capital to give one＇s complaint） and Shangkong （上控, appeal to a higher court）. Howerver, there is a lack of detailed analysis in contemporary study. Some scholars even regard Kouhn as Jingkong. There is mis- understanding that Jingkong belongs to direct appeal. In Kouhun in Draft History of Qing, and there are different fact, there are respective definition of Jingkong and proceedings concerning Jingkong and Kouhun. This article explores the difference between Kouhun, Jingkong and Shangkong from perspective of and conviction and sentencing so as to renew the understanding of Jingkong and Kouhun. hearing procedure and conviction and sentencing so as to renew the understanding of Jingkong and Kouhun.
出处
《史学集刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第2期65-72,共8页
Collected Papers of History Studies
关键词
叩阍
京控
上控
越诉
Kouhun （叩阍）
Jingkong （京控）
Shangkong （上控）
Yuesu （越诉, present one＇s ap-peals and complaints to higher levels）
