期刊文献+

事务所规模、品牌声誉和竞争度对审计费用的影响——来自我国A股市场的证据 被引量:5

The Effect of Size,Brand and Competition of Audit Firms on Audit Fee——Evidence from a Stock Market in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文通过对2003-2009年我国A股上市公司审计费用进行分析,结果发现,事务所规模越大、品牌声誉越好、省市审计市场地位领先的事务所,越能够获得高额审计费用,其中声誉对审计费用的影响最大,其次是事务所规模,最后的市场占有率。同时,该文还发现Top10会对国有企业采用低价竞争策略,而Big4则不会降低审计费用;对于民营企业,Big4和Top10均不会采用低价竞争策略。 The paper analyses the effect of size, reputation and concentration of audit firm on audit fee based on the data of listed companies from 2003 to 2009. The results show that the larger the size is,the better brand is,and the more leading the firms are in the audit market, the more the audit frims tend to charge fee. Firm reputation plays the most important part in auditing fee, the next part is the frim size, and final part is the market share. The paper also finds that the top10 will charge state-owned companies low audit fees, but Big4 will not. As for private companies,neither Big4 nor top10 will lower audit fees.
作者 刘霞
出处 《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2013年第1期56-65,126,共10页 Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(2009121110034) 闽江学院青年育苗项目(ysy1121)
关键词 审计费用 事务所规模 品牌声誉 竞争度 audit fee firm size brand reputation competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Shimin Chen,Sunny Y. J. Sun,DongHui Wu. Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor analysis[J]. Journal of Accounting Review, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 2A. Watkins, W. Hillison and Morecrof, 2004, Audit quality: a synthesis of theory and empirical evidence[J]. Journal of Accounting Literature. 被引量:1
  • 3Dan A. Simunic, 1980,The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence[J], Journal of Accounting Re- search,Vol. 18,No. 1 (Spring):161-190. 被引量:1
  • 4Craswell,A. T. ,J,R. Francis,and S. L. Taylor ,1995,Auditor brand name reputations and industry speeialization[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 : 297-322. 被引量:1
  • 5David C. Hay, W. Robert Knechel, Norman Wong, 2006, Audit Fees:A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes [J]. Contemporary Aecounting Research, Volume 23, Issue 1 : 141 - 191. 被引量:1
  • 6Derek K. Chan, 1999,"Low-Balling"and Efficiency in a Two-Period Specialization Model of Auditing Competition [J], Contemporary Accounting Research, Volume 16, Issue 4 :609-642. 被引量:1
  • 7Chong-En Bai, Qiao Liua,Joe Lua, Frank M. Songa, Junxi Zhanga, 2004, Corporate governance and market valuation in China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics (32) :599-616. 被引量:1
  • 8Zoe-vonna Palmrose, 1986 ,The effect of nonaudit services on the pricing of audit services: further evidence[J]. Journal of Accounting Research (24) : 405-412. 被引量:1
  • 9DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor Independence, "low bailing" and Disclosure Regulations[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,3 (2):113-127. 被引量:1
  • 10Jere R. Francis and Earl R, Wilson, 1988, Auditor Chan- ges: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation[J], The Accounting Review.. Vol. 63,No. 4:663-682. 被引量:1

二级参考文献38

共引文献349

同被引文献65

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部