期刊文献+

中国上市公司初始审计的定价折扣考察——来自审计师变更的经验证据 被引量:41

Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch
原文传递
导出
摘要 初始审计的定价折扣具有重要的与审计独立性相关的公共政策含义。本文基于DeAngelo(1981)和Dye(1991)关于初始审计定价折扣的竞争性理论预期,利用2002——2004年我国审计市场的数据对初始审计的定价行为与特征进行了较为细致的实证考察。经验结果支持中国证监会关于审计费用的强制性公开披露政策,准租金和低价折扣引起的潜在的审计独立性问题会随着审计费用的公开披露而得到消除或减轻。本文还具有重要的监管含义:对审计师变更的监管应着重关注那些大型上市公司在小型会计师事务所之间进行变更的行为。 Initial audit pricing discount can have important public policy implications related with auditor independence.This paper,based on the two competitive theoretical models of DeAngelo(1981) and Dye(1991),empirically tests the pricing behavior of initial audit by using the data of Chinese security audit market of year 2002—2004.The empirical results support the usefulness of CSRC's policy that requires public companies to disclose the audit fee information in their annual reports,the potential audiuor independence problem aroused by quasi rent and pricing discount will be eliminated or mitigated as the audit fee information being disclosed.The empirical results also have an important regulatory implication:we should pay principal attentions to the auditor switch behavior of big public corporations changing their auditor between the small audit firms.
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第9期83-89,共7页 Accounting Research
基金 国家自然科学基金"中国证券审计市场的结构 行为与绩效研究"(项目批准号70672101)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献21

  • 1[美]肯尼斯.W.克拉克森 罗杰.勒鲁瓦.米勒 华东化工学院经济.《产业组织:理论,证据和公共政策》[M].上海三联书店,1989.. 被引量:1
  • 2李树华.[D].上海财经大学,1999. 被引量:1
  • 3Dopuch N. and D. Simunic, The Nature of Competition in the Auditing Profession, in Regulation and the Accounting Profes-sion edited by J. W. Bucldey and J. F. Weston, 1980. 被引量:1
  • 4J. W. Eichendeher and P. Danos, The Analysis of Industry -Specific Auditor Concentration: Towards an Explanatory Mod-el ,Accounting Review (July), 1981. 被引量:1
  • 5Rhode J. ,G. M. Whitsell and R. L. Kelsey,An Analysis of Clint- Industry Concentrations for Large Public Accounting Firms,Accounting Review (October), 1974. 被引量:1
  • 6Schiff A. and H. D. Fried, Large Companies and the Big Eight-An Overview,Abacus (December), 1976. 被引量:1
  • 7Zeff S. A., and R. L. Fossum, An Analysis of Large Audit Client, Accounting Reviews(April), 1967. 被引量:1
  • 8Ananth Seetharaman, Ferdinand A. Gul, Stephen G. lynn. Litigation risk and fees:evidence from UK firms cross listed on US markets[J ]Journal of Accounting and economics,2002, Vol. 36 91 - 115. 被引量:1
  • 9Kenton B. Walker and Eric N. Johson. 1996. A review and Synthesis of Research on Supplier Concentration, Quality and Fee Structure in Non- U. S. Markets for Auditor Services [ J ] The International Journal of Accounting,Vol. 31, No. 1: 1- 18. 被引量:1
  • 10Mark H. Taylor and Danniel T. Simon. 1999. Determinants of Audit Fees: The Importance of Litigation, Disclosure, and Regulatory Burdens in Audit Engagements in 20 Countr[J]The International Journed of Accounting,Vol. 34,No.3,375-388. 被引量:1

共引文献493

引证文献41

二级引证文献287

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部