期刊文献+

高孤独感儿童的社会认知偏差 被引量:14

Social Cognitive Biases of Lonely Proneness Children
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探查孤独感儿童的社会认知偏差,为孤独感儿童的认知干预提供指导。方法 :依儿童孤独量表(Chil鄄dren’s Loneliness Scale,CLS)得分将131名儿童分为孤独感高分组和低分组,进一步让被试填写自编社会认知偏差情景问卷,比较高低孤独感儿童的社会认知偏差。结果:①孤独感高分组儿童更倾向于对负性情境进行指向自我和他人的稳定的归因,低分组儿童倾向进行他人不稳定的归因;②高分组更难以向拒绝者求助,更多考虑采取退缩、回避社会交往情境的行为;③高分组更倾向于对情景做消极结果预期,而较少做积极结果预期。结论:与低分组儿童相比,孤独感高分组儿童更倾向于做负性归因、决定采取回避反应以及对情境结果做消极预期。 Objective: To explore social cognitive biases among lonely proneness children. Methods: 131 pupils were assigned into two groups according to their scores of Children's Loneliness Scale(CLS). They were then surveyed by situational questionnaire made by authors to study social cognitive biases among these two groups. Results: ①Lonely children were prone to make stable attributions to themselves and others in negative situation, while normal children were more likely to make unstable attributions to others. ②In the aspects of responses construction to the negative situation, it was hard for the lonely proneness children to ask for help from people who had refused them before, and they tended to exhibit withdrawal behaviors. ③The lonely proneness children were prone to expect more negative results and less positive results in the negative situations. Conclusion: Compared with normal children, lonely proneness children are more prone to make negative attributions, decide to withdraw from social interaction and expect negative results in negative situations. In other words, lonely children have obvious social cognitive biases.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期119-121,118,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 孤独感 社会认知偏差 归因 反应建构 结果预期 Loneliness Social cognitive biases Attribution Responses construction Results expectation
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献44

共引文献168

同被引文献256

引证文献14

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部