期刊文献+

蒙特利尔认知评估量表在癫认知功能障碍患者中的应用价值 被引量:9

Evaluation of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Epilepsy Patients with Cognitive Impairment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)量表筛查癫痫患者认知功能障碍的应用价值。方法使用简明精神状态检查(MMSE)量表筛查出认知功能正常的120例癫痫患者,再行MoCA量表评分。依据MoCA量表评分结果将120例癫痫患者分为①认知功能正常(NC)组:MoCA量表评分≥26分;②认知功能损害(CI)组:MoCA量表评分〈26分。比较两组癫痫患者MoCA量表各项分数的差异及认知功能改变的特点,应用单因素及多元Logistic回归分析认知功能损害的影响因素。结果①120例患者中50例(41.7%)MoCA量表评分〈26分;②CI组MoCA量表各条目得分均低于NC组,差异有统计学意义(p〈0.05);③Logistic回归分析结果显示,受教育年限是认知功能损害的影响因素(OR=1.34,95%CI:1.05~1.70,P〈0.05)。结论MMSE正常癫痫患者中仍存在相当比例MoCA量表评分异常的患者。建议使用MoCA量表测试癫痫患者的认知功能水平。 Aim To evaluate the application of Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) in epilepsy patients with cognitive impairment. Methods Epilepsy patients with normal cognition were examined by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), whose MMSE scores were included in the further study of MoCA testing. The patients with MoCA score not less than 26 were selected into normal control (NC) group, and the patients with less than 26 into cognitive impaired (CI) group. MoCA scores in CI group being used as dependent variable, gender, educational level, age, course of disease, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale(HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale(HAMA), Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS), Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS) were used as independent variable. And the risk Scale(HAMD), HAMA, SDS, SAS were used as independent variable. The risk factors of CI in epilepsy patients was analyzed by Logistic linear regression analysis. Results There are 41.7% (50/120) epilepsy patients with MMSE less than 26 while their MoCA not less than 26. There were significant differences between CI group and NC group in subtests ofMoCA. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis showed that educational level was the most significant factor in CI(OR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.05-1.70, P〈0.05). Conclusion There was a high proportion of epilepsy patients whose MMSE testshowed normal but MoCA test showed cognitive impairment. Therefore, it was recommended that the cognitive level of epilepsy patients should be used by MoCA clinically.
作者 韩健 尹琪华
出处 《中国临床神经科学》 2013年第1期75-80,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Neurosciences
关键词 帕金森病 认知功能障碍 蒙特利尔认知评估量表 epilepsy cognition disorder Montreal Cognitive Assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Nazem S,Siderowf AD,Duda JE. Montreal cognitive assessment performance in patients with Parkinson's disease with "normal" global cognition according to mini-mental state examination score[J].Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,2009,(2):304-308.doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02096.x. 被引量:1
  • 2Lee JY,Dong Woo Lee,Cho SJ. Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly outpatient clinic:validation of the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment[J].Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology,2008,(2):104-110.doi:10.1177/0891988708316855. 被引量:1
  • 3Gill DJ,Freshman A,Blender JA. The Montreal cognitive assessment as a screening tool for cognitive impaimaent in Parkinson's disease[J].Movement Disorders,2008.1043-1046. 被引量:1
  • 4Olson RA,Chhanabhai T,McKenzie M. Feasibility study of the Montreal Cognitive Assess-ment(MoCA)in patients with brain metastases[J].Supportive Care in Cancer,2008.1273-1278. 被引量:1
  • 5国际抗癫痫联盟分类和名词委员会推荐的癫痫和癫痫综合征的分类(1989)[J].中华神经科杂志,2001,34(3):187-187. 被引量:40
  • 6Devinsky O,Vickrey BG,Cramer J. Development of the quality of life in epilepsy inventory[J].Epilepsia,1995.1089-1104. 被引量:1
  • 7Crum RM,Anthony JC,Bassett SS. Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level[J].Journal of the American Medical Association,1993.2386-2391. 被引量:1
  • 8Nasreddine ZS,Phillips NA,Beédirian V. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment,MoCA:A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment[J].Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,2005,(4):695-699.doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. 被引量:1
  • 9Yam WK,Ronen GM,Cherk SW. Health-related quality of life of children with epilepsy in Hong Kong:how does it compare with that of youth with epilepsy in Canada[J].Epilepsy and Behavior,2008.419-426. 被引量:1
  • 10Bech P,Engelhardt N,Evans KR. Why the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale endures[J].American Journal of Psychiatry,2005.2397-2398. 被引量:1

二级参考文献87

共引文献113

同被引文献96

引证文献9

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部