期刊文献+

单纯髓核摘除术与髓核摘除辅助Coflex动态固定术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效对比研究 被引量:17

Discectomy and discectomy plus Cofiex fixation for lumbar disc herniation, a clinical comparison study
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】通过单纯髓核摘除术与加用Coflex棘突间动态稳定系统治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效对比研究,评价Coflex在治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的应用价值。【方法】2007年11月至2008年8月分别采用单纯髓核摘除术与加用Coflex棘突间动态稳定系统治疗腰椎间盘突出症50例,男性31例,女性19例;年龄30~72岁,平均52.5岁。病史6~48个月, 平均15.6个月。其中单纯髓核摘除组26例,Coflex固定组24例。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分和影像学分析,采用配对t检验及单向方差分析,评价Coflex动态稳定系统在治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的价值。【结果】单纯髓核摘除组与Coflex固定组在JOA、ODI、VAS评分上较术前均有显著改善(t=-33.2~64.5,P〈0.01),但单纯髓核摘除术组末次随访ODI评分显著增加,由术后12个月的6.7±1.5增加到10.2±2.3(t=-19.3,P〈0.05)。影像学显示Coflex固定组手术前后手术节段椎间盘背侧高度(HD)、椎间孔间最大距离(DIF)、棘突顶距(DS)及椎管面积(SA)均明显增加(t=-34.4~4.5,P〈0.05)。单纯髓核摘除术组上述指标则显著减小(t=3.4~52.8,P〈0.05)。Coflex固定组在HD、DIF、DS上均高于单纯髓核摘除组,差异具有统计学意义(F=14.1~25.6,P〈0.05)。【结论】腰椎间盘突出单纯髓核摘除术与加用Coflex治疗腰椎间盘突出症均有显著疗效,但Coflex固定组确实增加了椎间盘背侧高度和椎间孔间最大距离,在近中期疗效、防止腰椎退变方面明显优于单纯髓核摘除组。 Objective To compare clinical efficacy between discectomy and discectomy plus Coflex fixation for lumbar disc herniation. Methods From December 2007 to August 2008, 50 patients (31 males and 19 females)were treated by surgery of discectomy and diseectomy plus Coflex fixation. The average age was 52.5 years (range, 30-72 years). There were 24 cases in the group of discectomy plus Coflex fixation and 26 cases in the group of discectomy. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scales ( VAS ) , Japanese Orthopadic Association (JOA) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded, as well as radiologieal index. And use a paired t-test and one-way analysis of variance ( one-way ANOVA) statistical method to evaluate the Coflex dynamic stabilization system in value in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Results Both groups received significant improvement of JOA, ODI and VAS ( t = - 33.2- 64. 5,P 〈 0. 01 ), but the group of diseectomy was found with deterioration of ODI at last follow-up, 12 months after surgery 6. 7 ± 1.5 to 10. 2 ± 2. 3 ( t = - 19. 3, P 〈 0. 05 ). The group of discectomy plus Coflex fixation was found with significant increase of height of dorsal intervertebral discs ( HD ), distance across the two adjacent spinons processes (DS) , distance of intervertebral foramina (DIF) and spinal canal area(SA) ( t = - 34.4-4. 5, P 〈 0. 05). In contrast, the group of disceetomy was found with significant decrease of HD,DS,DIF and SA(t =3.4-52.8,P 〈0. 05). Coflex fixed group in HD, DIF, DS significant difference with simple discectomy group, with a statistically significant (F = 14. 1-25.6, P 〈 0.05). Conclusions Both discectomy and discectomy plus Coflex fixation are apparently effective when treating lumbar disc: herniation. Coflex can significantly increase the HD and DIF when used for lumbar disc herniation, and it has positive influence for keeping height of lumbar vertebral space and treating the nerve root symptom of lumba
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期147-151,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 腰椎 椎间盘移位 内固定器 假体和植入物 治疗结果 Lumbar vertebrae Intervertebral disk displacement Internal fixatiors Prostheses and implants Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Fandi(n)o J,Botana C,Viladrich A. Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery:results in 130 cases[J].Acta Neurochirungica Supplements(Wien),1993.102-104. 被引量:1
  • 2Wong HK,Goh JC,Goh PS. Paired cylindrical interbody cage fit and facetectomy in posterior lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2001.572-577. 被引量:1
  • 3Hasegawa K,Ikeda M,Washio T. An experimental study of porcine lumbar segmental stiffness by the distraction-compression principle using a threaded interbody cage[J].Journal of Spinal Disorders,2000.247-252. 被引量:1
  • 4徐丁,陈一衡,曾晗冰,池永龙,徐华梓.Coflex棘突间动态固定系统治疗腰椎间盘突出症的短期疗效评价[J].中华外科杂志,2009,47(18):1379-1382. 被引量:26
  • 5陈一衡,徐华梓,徐丁,池永龙,王向阳,黄其杉,徐晖.棘突间动态内固定装置治疗腰痛的临床应用评价[J].中华骨科杂志,2010,30(9):848-853. 被引量:9
  • 6Haughton VM,Sehmidt TA,Keele K. Flexibility ot lumbar spinal motion segments correlated to type of tears in the annulus fibrosus[J].Neurosurgery,2000,(1 Supp1):81-86. 被引量:1
  • 7Meakin JR,Redpath TW,Hukins DW. The effect of partial removal of the nucleus pulposus from the intervertebral disc on the response of the human annulus fibrosus to compression[J].Clinical Biomechanics(Bristol,Avon),2001.121-128. 被引量:1
  • 8Gupta S,Soellinger M,Boesiger P. Three-dimensional computational modeling of subject-specific cerebrospinal fluid flow iu the subarachnoid space[J].Journal of Biomechanical Engineering,2009.021010. 被引量:1
  • 9Richter A,Schütz C,Hauck M. Does an interspinous device (Coflex)improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis One-year follow up of a prospective care control studv of 60 patients[J].European Spine Journal,2010.283-289. 被引量:1
  • 10周洋,徐华梓,池永龙,吴立军,杨建生,陈一衡.Coflex动态稳定装置在L5/S1退变性疾病中的应用[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2011,21(8):627-632. 被引量:11

二级参考文献32

  • 1钱宇,范顺武,方向前,胡月正,顾传龙.下腰椎椎间孔形态与椎间盘高度丢失的相关性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(9):536-540. 被引量:24
  • 2胡有谷.腰椎间盘退变的MRI诊断[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2005,41(3):189-191. 被引量:12
  • 3关凯,孙天胜,李放,时述山.动态固定及其在腰椎退行性疾病中的应用现状[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(9):709-711. 被引量:9
  • 4Wong HK, Goh JC, Goh PS. Paired cylindrical interbody cage fit and facetectomy in posterior lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population. Spine,2001,26 : 572-577. 被引量:1
  • 5Hasegawa K, lkeda M, Washio T, et al. An experimental study of porcine lumbar segmental stiffness by the distraction-compression principle using a threaded interbody cage. J Spinal Disord, 2000, 13:247-252. 被引量:1
  • 6Senegas J, Vital JM, Pointillart V, et al. Long-term actuarial survivorship analysis of an interspinous stabilization system. Ear Spine J, 2007, 16 : 1279-1287. 被引量:1
  • 7Guigui P, Dessarts I, Morvan G, et al. Fractures of the ischium after laminoarthrectomy. Retrospective study of a series of 31 patients. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 1998,84:247- 257. 被引量:1
  • 8Christie SD, Song JK, Fessler RG. Dynamic interspinnus process technology. Spine, 2005, 30 Suppl 16:S73-78. 被引量:1
  • 9Bono CM, Vaccaro AR. Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2007, 20:255-261. 被引量:1
  • 10Kumar MN,Baklanov A,Chopin D.Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.Eur Spine J,2001,10(4):314-319. 被引量:1

共引文献35

同被引文献181

引证文献17

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部