期刊文献+

测量高频交易领域中的指令流毒性——基于我国沪深300指数期货的实证研究 被引量:8

Measuring Flow Toxicity in a High Frequency World ——Empirical Research based on the CSI300 Index
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为量化投资的前沿和热点问题,市场微观结构和高频交易近年来在国内备受关注,但是由于我国的股指期货推出比较晚,学术界对此关注的并不多。本文正是在此背景下研究了我国股指期货市场的指令流毒性,当指令流逆向的选择做市商时,指令流则被认为是有毒性的。本文采用最新的测量指令流毒性的方法——等交易量信息交易的概率(VPIN),来度量我国股指期货市场上的指令流毒性。实证结果表明,VPIN不仅可以监测到沪深300指数期货大跌时候的指令流毒性,在指数大涨的时候,也能很好的监测到股指期货市场的指令流毒性。跟踪VPIN值可以使流动性提供者控制他们的头寸风险;监管者可以监控市场的流动性质量,提前限制交易或者加强市场控制。 In recent years, as the leading edge of the quantitative investment and hot issue, Market microstructure and high frequency trading has been concerned in China. But Academics' concern is not much Because of stock index futures launched relatively late in our country. In this context, we study the flow toxicity in china's stock index futures. Order flow is regarded as toxic when it adversely selects market makers. This paper uses the newest method, Volume-Synchronized Probability of In- formed Trading( VPIN), to measure order flow toxicity in HS300 index futures. The empirieal results show that VPIN can moni- tor the flow toxicity no matter index rose or crash. Tracking the VPIN would allow market makers or liquidity provider to control their risk. Regulator can monitor the "quality" of liquidity provision, and can pro-actively move to restrict trading or impose market controls.
机构地区 西南财经大学
出处 《中国经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期81-91,共11页 China Economic Studies
基金 国家自然科学基金<复杂衍生产品的蒙特卡洛定价方法研究>(71271173)资助
关键词 流动性 指令流毒性 市场微观结构 VPIN liquidity flow toxicity market microstructure VPIN
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Brogaard J. 2010. High Frequency Trading and Its impact on Market Quality [ Z]. SSRN Working Paper. 被引量:1
  • 2Easley D, Engle R F, O'Hara M, et al. 2008. Time-Varying Arrival Rates of Informed and Uninformed Traders [ J ]. Journal of Financial Econometrics ,6 (2) : 171-207. 被引量:1
  • 3Easley D,Lopez de Prado M,O'Hara M. 2011a. The Microstructure of the 'Flash Crash':Flow Toxicity, Liquidity Cra- shes and the Probability of Informed Trading [ J ]. The Journal of Portfolio Management ,37 ( 2 ) : 118-128. 被引量:1
  • 4Easley D,L6pez de Prado M,O'Hara M. 2011b. The Exchange of Flow Toxicity [J]. The Journal of Trading,6(2) :8- 13. 被引量:1
  • 5Easley D, L6pez de Prado M, O'Hara M. 2012. Bulk Classification of Trading Activity [ Z]. SSRN Working Paper. 被引量:1
  • 6Easley D, Kiefer N, O'Hara M. et al. 1996. Liquidity,Information, and Infrequently Traded Stocks [ J]. Journal of Fi- nance,51 (4) : 1405-1436. 被引量:1
  • 7Glosten L. R, Milgrom P. 1985. Bid ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (2) :71 - 100. 被引量:1
  • 8Huang J, Wang J. 2009. Liquidity and Market Crashes [ J]. Review of Financial Studies,22 (7) :2607-2643. 被引量:1
  • 9Kirilenko A, Kyle A P, Samedi M, et al. 2010. The Flash Crash:The Impact of High-Frequency Trading on an Electronic Market [ Z ]. SSRN Working paper. 被引量:1
  • 10刘阳,马永强.上市公司信息披露制度、股票交易与投资者保护[J].中国经济问题,2012(4):94-102. 被引量:3

二级参考文献10

共引文献2

同被引文献102

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部