摘要
台湾通过建立智慧财产法院并且允许其在专利侵权等案件审理中一并审查专利无效问题,试图解决以往侵权诉讼必须中止等待行政裁判结果所导致的诉讼迟延等一系列问题,由此形成了行政机关与法院均可宣告专利无效的"双轨制"。虽然立法仅赋予法院在宣告专利无效方面有限性的权力,但是"双轨制"仍然容易导致权力冲突及针对同一客体出现不一致裁判等问题。事实上,台湾现行专利无效宣告制度是仿效日本法上相关制度而来,因而有必要深入考察日本法相关制度并且予以借鉴,通过强化行政机关审查专利无效职能,加强行政机关与法院信息沟通以及赋予法院裁判对行政机关一定拘束力等制度设计来克服"双轨制"的相关问题。
In order to solve a series of problems of the delayed litigation caused by suspending a case to wait for the result of administrative referee in the infringement of lawsuit in the past, Taiwan authority attempts to establish the intellectual property court and allows it to decide the patent invalidation in the related patent litigation. Thus the ＂double track＂ of declaring the pa- tent invalidation by both the executive and the court is formed. Although the legislation gives the court the restrictive right to decide the patent invalidity,the practice of the double track could easily lead to power confrontations and inconsistent referees over the same object. In fact,the existing patent invalidity declaration system in Taiwan is exactly modeled from that of Japan. Therefore,it is necessary to make a careful study of its law system and use it for our reference. And at the same time, we should try every possible means to strengthen the administrative review of the patent invalidation functions, establish the information ex- change system between the administrative organ and the court and give the court the decision on binding over the administrative organ so as to overcome the problems resulting from the practice of the ＂double-track＂.
出处
《台湾研究集刊》
CSSCI
2012年第6期31-38,共8页
Taiwan Research Journal
基金
国家社科基金项目"知识产权争议多元化解决机制研究"(10CFX037)
上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金(HZF09010)
关键词
专利
无效宣告
双轨制
完善
patent, invalidation declaration, double-track, perfection
