期刊文献+

尊重患者自主与医疗信息告知例外 被引量:1

Respect for Patients' Autonomy and the Exception for Medical Information Disclosure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 尊重患者自主是医疗信息告知的道德基础与行动指南,医疗信息告知是否恰当要看其是否充分体现了尊重患者自主这一伦理本质,而医疗信息告知例外也应在尊重患者自主原则的指导下进行。在医疗信息告知可能给患者带来伤害的情形下,单纯诉诸于行善原则无法为医疗信息告知例外提供充分的伦理辩护。尊重患者自主辩护下的医疗信息告知例外有三种情况:患者无知情能力、急救、患者自愿放弃知情权。 Respect for patients' autonomy is the moral foundation of and action direction for medical informa tion disclosure. Whether medical information disclosure is carried out properly depends on its reflecting the ethical essence, at the same time, the exception for medical information disclosure should also be practiced according to the principle of respect for patient autonomy. When medical information disclosure may cause patients harms, sim ply resorting the principle of beneficence cannot defend the exception for medical information disclosure adequately. Exception for medical information disclosure based on respecting for patients' autonomy may happen when the pa tient had no ability of cognizance, in emergency and when the patients volunteer to give up the right to know.
出处 《中国医学伦理学》 2012年第6期785-787,共3页 Chinese Medical Ethics
基金 广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目 项目编号:GD11YZX02 广东省普通高校人文社会科学研究项目 项目编号:11WYXM016
关键词 尊重患者自主 医疗信息告知例外 患者知情权 行善原则 Respect for Patients'Autonomy Exception for Medical Information Disclosure Patient's right toknow Principle of Beneficence
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献21

  • 1崔东辰,耿军.择期性手术病人的心理应激及护理对策[J].中华护理杂志,1996,31(12):692-695. 被引量:445
  • 2李远贵 张茹英.临床护理科研原理[M].西安:世界图书出版西安公司,1996.222. 被引量:13
  • 3徐向东.自我、他人与道德-道德哲学导论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007.629. 被引量:9
  • 4Tom Beauchamp, James Childress. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. , Oxford University Press, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 5Onora O' Neill. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics [ M ]. Cambridge University Press, 2002. 被引量:1
  • 6Gerald Dworkin. Review: Can You Trust Autonomy? [ J]. The Hasting Center Report,2003,33 ( 2 ). 被引量:1
  • 7James F. Childress. Who Should Decide? Paternalism in Health Care [ M ]. Oxford University Press, 1982. 被引量:1
  • 8Bonnie Steinboek. The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics [ M ]. Oxford University Press, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 9Terrence F. Ackerman. Why Doctors Should Intervene [ A ]. In: Thomas A. Mappes, David Degrazia. Biomedical Ethics[ C]. New York: McGraw - Hill Higher Education,2006:. 被引量:1
  • 10[德]康德.道德的形而上学之基础[M].李明辉译.台北:联经出版社,1990. 被引量:1

共引文献16

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部