期刊文献+

预算软约束、持续经营与投资者风险偏好漂移——实验室实验的证据 被引量:3

Soft Budget Constraints,Going-concern and Risk Preference Drift of Investors——Evidences From Lab Experiment
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用实验经济学方法设置3种不同风险的投资选择和4类预算软约束市场,检验预算软约束对投资者行为的影响。结果发现,预算软约束提高了投资者的风险偏好程度,持续经营则削弱了投资者的风险偏好程度,风险偏好漂移女性比男性更明显;持续经营实验中投资者资产较高或较低时冒险、资产中等时相对风险规避,投资者的前期收益情况会影响其当期投资选择,投资者存在短视行为。 In order to test the influence of soft budget constraints on investor's behavior, we utilize economics experiments tv design 3 kinds of investment options with risk and 4 kinds of market structure with different soft budget constraints. It shows that soft budget constraints increase investors' risk preference, while sustainable management decreases risk their preference. Female investors are more likely to change their risk preference than males. In the sustainable management experiments, investors are risk-seeking when they have much or little capital, and they are risk-averse with moderate capital. There are short-sight effects when investors make decisions, and their profit of prior periods has an obvious effect on the current options.
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第10期43-48,共6页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172068 70972086 71132001) 国家社会科学基金重大招标课题子课题(10zd&035) 长江学者和创新团队发展计划项目(PCSIRT)
关键词 预算软约束 持续经营 风险偏好漂移 实验 Soft Budget Constraint Sustainable Management Risk Preference Drift Experimen
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1雅诺什·科尔内.短缺经济学下卷[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1986:2-27. 被引量:1
  • 2Qian Y Y. A theory of shortage in socialist economies based on the soft budget constraint [J]. American Economic Review, 1994,84 (1) : 145 : 156. 被引量:1
  • 3Dewatripont M, Maskin E. Credit and efficiency in centralized and decentralized economies[J]. Review of Economic Studies,1995,62(4):541:555. 被引量:1
  • 4Bai C, Wang Y. Bureaucratic control and the soft budget constraint [J ]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 1998,26(1) :41:61. 被引量:1
  • 5Huang H Z, Xu C G. Soft budget constraint and the optimal choices of research and development projects financing [J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 1998,26(1) :62:79. 被引量:1
  • 6Huang H Z, Xu C G. Institutions, innovations, and growth[J]. American Economic Review, 1999 ,89(2) : 438:443. 被引量:1
  • 7Huang H Z, Xu C G. Financial institutions and the financial crisis in East Asia[J]. European Economic Review, 1999,43(4:6) :903:914. 被引量:1
  • 8Lin Y f, Tan G F. Policy burdens, accountability, and the soft budget constraint [J]. American Economic Review, 1999,89(2) : 426:431. 被引量:1
  • 9林毅夫,李志赟.政策性负担、道德风险与预算软约束[J].经济研究,2004,39(2):17-27. 被引量:1092
  • 10林毅夫,刘明兴,章奇.企业预算软约束的成因分析[J].江海学刊,2003(5):49-54. 被引量:25

二级参考文献185

共引文献1645

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部