摘要
在我国,减刑由刑罚执行机关提出申请,法院组成合议庭审查决定,这一程序难以保证减刑的公正性。为此,我国学者提出多种改革建议,这些建议角度不同,但是其共同点在于增加减刑程序的对抗性、参与性和公开性。然而,在当前基本的减刑制度下,仅通过程序本身的修改难以解决其中所存在的实质问题。要解决这一问题,可以借鉴法国的信用减刑制度,构建先减后撤的减刑制度。只有在信用减刑制度下,才可能真正通过减刑程序的司法化,实现减刑的公平、公正。
At present reduction of penalty is proposed by the penalty execution organ and examined by the court. This procedure can hardly guarantee the justice of reduction of penalty . Therefore, scholars have put forward diversified reform advice, which is based on the same grounds of participation, antagonism and transparency. Nevertheless, under the fundamental system of reduction of penalty, it’s impossible to solve the essential problems of the procedure of reduction of penalty by the reform of the procedure itself. To achieve that, we can borrow ideas from the system of the credit of reduction of penalty of France to construct the system of reduction before rescission. Only under this system is it possible to realize the justice of reduction of penalty through the judicialized procedure.
出处
《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第6期41-47,共7页
Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）
关键词
减刑
减刑程序
信用减刑
司法化
reduction of penalty
procedure of reduction of penalty
credit of reduction of penalty
judicialization
