摘要
关于裁量基准制定权限的划分,理论和实践中存在不同的认识和做法。从本质上来说,裁量基准是一种同时具有行政自制和规则主义两种属性的新型控权技术。过分提升基准的制定权限,可能与其行政自制的实质属性有所背离,过分放开基准的制定权限,亦可能与其规则主义形式属性有所背离。结合裁量基准的双重属性,较为理性的做法是在同时尊重行政自制和规则主义的基础上,将制定权限确定在省级行政机关以下、县级行政机关以上的闭合区间内加以分配,它本身亦源于行政机关的执法权,而不是立法权。
The academic circles and professional circles have different viewpoint to the function allocating of administrative discretion standard＇s making. In our opinion, administrative discretion standard is a administrative self - restraint norm,which has features of Rule Doctrine and Administrative Self - restraint contemporaneously. So on the one hand, we should not restrict the power division overly,because it is contrary to discretion standard＇s essence of Administrative Self - restraint. On the other hand, we should not ＂open the power division to all agencies analogously,because it is also contrary to discretion standard＇s essence of Rule Doctrine. According to this features, we think the rational point is respecting the essence of Rule Doctrine and Administrative Self - restraint contemporaneously, allocating the power of making discretion standard in a closure range which is from the level of country agency to provincial agency, and making sure the power of discretion standard＇s making is not legislative. It is just a law enforcement power.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第11期15-20,共6页
Law Science Magazine
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"行政裁量基准制度研究"(08BFX020)的阶段成果
关键词
裁量基准
行政自制
规则主义
权限划分
discretion standard
administrative self- restraint
rule doctrine
function allocating
