期刊文献+

社会性科学议题在物理教学中的运用 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 社会性科学议题在物理教学中有助于学生理解物理概念,发展非形式推理能力。此外,社会性科学议题也是实施科学、技术、社会、环境关系教育(STSE)的一种手段,可以帮助学生正确认识科学、技术对个人与社会的影响。
出处 《教育导刊(上半月)》 2012年第11期81-83,共3页 Journal of Educational Development
基金 2012年度浙江省中小学教育研究重点规划课题"社会性科学议题情境中科学本质教学实证研究"(编号:033091)成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1John Seely Brown, Allan Collins, Paul Duguid. Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning [J] . Educational Researcher, 1989, 18 (1): 32-42. 被引量:1
  • 2Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics [J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2002, 39, : 35 - 62. 被引量:1
  • 3张奇,张黎.SSI课程与学生非形式推理能力的培养[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2007,25(2):59-64. 被引量:14
  • 4Linda S. Gottfredson. Dissecting practical intelligence theo- ry: Its claims and evidence [J].Intelligence, 2003, 31: 343 - 397. 被引量:1
  • 5Mustafa Sami Topcu, Troy D. Sadler and Ozgul Yilmaz- Tuzun. Preservice Science Teachers' Informal Reasoning about Socio- scientific Issues: The influence of issue context [ J] . International Journal of Science Education, 2010, 32: 2475-2495. 被引量:1
  • 6中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育物理课程标准[S].北京师范大学大学出版社,2011:7. 被引量:2
  • 7Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D.L., & Chambers, F.W. Student conceptualisations of the nature of science in response to a socioscien- tific issue. International Journal of Science Education , 2004, 26: 387 - 409. 被引量:1
  • 8Hongming Ma. Chinese Secondary School Science Teachers' Understanding of the Nature of Science--Emerging from Their Views of Nature [J] . Research in Science Education, 2009 39:701 - 724. 被引量:1

二级参考文献25

  • 1Driver, R. Newton , P. Osborne, J. (2002). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84:287 - 312. 被引量:1
  • 2KolstΦ, S. D. (2001a) Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85 : 291 - 310. 被引量:1
  • 3Zeidler, D. L. (1984). Moral issues and social policy in science education: closing the literacy gap. Science Education, 68:411-419. 被引量:1
  • 4Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77: 319-337. 被引量:1
  • 5Sadler, T. D, Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Patten of informal reasoning in the context of socioseientifie decision - making. Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Nashville. 被引量:1
  • 6Perkins, D. N, (1985). Post-prlmary education has little impact upon informal reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77:562-571. 被引量:1
  • 7Zohas, A. Nemet F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39:35-62. 被引量:1
  • 8Patronis, T, Potari, D, Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' arugumentation in decision - making on a socio - scientific issue: implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21 : 745 - 754. 被引量:1
  • 9Aikenhead, G, (2004). What is STS in science teaching? . In: D. L. Zeidler, T D.Sadler Beyond STS: A research- based framework for socioscientific issues education. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver. 被引量:1
  • 10Geddis, A. N. (1991). Improving the quality of science classroom discourse on controversial issues. Science Education, 75 (2): 169- 183. 被引量:1

共引文献14

同被引文献20

引证文献5

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部