期刊文献+

透明质酸联合羟乙基淀粉预防大鼠术后腹腔粘连的效果观察 被引量:2

Research of hyaluronic acid and hydroxyethyl starch in the prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesion in rats
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨透明质酸(HA)、羟乙基淀粉(HES)防粘连剂预防大鼠术后腹腔粘连的最佳剂量及其效果。方法以HA、HES为原料制备不同浓度的防粘连剂;选择SD大鼠55只,随机分为阴性对照组(生理盐水)、阳性对照组(HA-羧甲基纤维素)、HA组(0.5%HA和1.0%HA)、HA+HES组(1.0%HA+0.03%HES、1.0%HA+0.06%HES、1.0%HA+0.12%HES、1.0%HA+0.24%HES、1.0%HA+0.50%HES);腹腔手术制备大鼠腹腔粘连模型后,分别注入不同浓度的防粘连剂,7 d后观察各组的防粘连效果。结果 1.0%HA+0.50%HES腹腔粘连面积为(0.06±0.10)cm2,粘连等级为Ⅰ级,达到理想防粘连效果。结论 1.0%HA+0.50%HES防粘连剂可明显预防腹腔粘连形成。 Objective To observe the effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) on preventing SD rats postoperative adhesion and optimal dose. Methods HA and HES as raw materials were used to preparate the dif ferent concentrations of antiadhesion agent; Selecting 55 SD rats were divided randomly into negative control group ( sa line), positive control group ( HA-Carboxymethyl cellulose), HA group (0.5% HA and 1.0% HA ), HA + HES group (1.0% HA+0.03% HES, 1.0% HA+0.06% HES, 1.0% HA+0.12% HES, 1.0% HA+0.24% HES, 1.0% HA +0.50% HES); After abdominal operation preparation of rat peritoneal adhesion model were injected into the different concentration of anti-adhesion agents and observed the effects of anti-adhesion agents at 7 d later. Results 1.0% HA + 0.50% HES postoperative adhesion area was (0.06 ±O. 10)cm2, adhesion grade I achieved the ideal effect of preventing adhesion. Conclusion 1.0% HA + O. 50% HES anti-adhesion agent can obviously prevent the formation of postoperative adhesion.
出处 《山东医药》 CAS 2012年第29期30-32,共3页 Shandong Medical Journal
基金 辽宁省教育厅高校科研项目(L2010030)
关键词 透明质酸 羟乙基淀粉 防粘连 大鼠 hyaluronic acid hetastarch anti-adhesion rats
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1Dalberg K, Johansson H, Signomklao T, et al. A randomised study of axillary drainage and pectoral fascia preservation after mastectomy for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2004, 30(6): 602-609. 被引量:1
  • 2Porter KA, O'Connor S, Rimm E, et al. Electrocautery as a factor in seroma formation following mastectomy. Am J Surg, 1998, 176(1): 8-11. 被引量:1
  • 3Woodworth PA, McBoyle MF, Helmer SD, et al. Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: incidence and predicting factors.Am Surg, 2000, 66(5): 444-450; 被引量:1
  • 4Adele L, Vinton L, Traverso W, et al. Wound complication after modified radical mastectomy compared with tylectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Am J Surg, 1991, 161(5) : 584-588. 被引量:1
  • 5Divino CM, Kuerer HM, Tartter PI. Drains prevent seromas following lumpectomy with axillary dissection. Breast J, 2000, 6(1) :31-33. 被引量:1
  • 6Gonzalez EA, Saltzstein EC, Riedner CS, et al. Seroma formation following breast cancer surgery. Breast J, 2003, 9(5) : 385-388. 被引量:1
  • 7van Dam MS, Hennipman A, de Kruif JT, et al. Axillary padding as an alternative to dosed suction drain for ambulatory axillary lymphadenectomy: a prospective cohort of 207 patients with early breast cancer. Arch Surg, 2002, 137(2): 169-173. 被引量:1
  • 8Hashemi E, Kaviani A, Najafi M, et al. Seroma formation after surgery for breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol, 2004, 2(1): 44. 被引量:1
  • 9Lumachi F, Brandes AA, Burelli P, et al. Seroma prevention following axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer by using ultrasound scissors: a prospective clinical study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004, 30(5): 526-530. 被引量:1
  • 10McCaul JA, Aslaam A, Spooner RJ, et al. Aetiology of seroma formation in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Breast,2000, 9(3): 144-148. 被引量:1

共引文献156

同被引文献17

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部