期刊文献+

《企业所得税法》一般反避税条款适用要件的审思与确立——基于国外的经验与借鉴 被引量:34

General Anti-Avoidance Rule and Its Application Requirement: Reference to Foreign Experience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国于2008年开始实施的《企业所得税法》确立了一般反避税条款,并将其作为反避税交易的一般规则,这将对税收征管产生深远的影响。但《企业所得税法》第47条、《企业所得税法实施条例》以及《特别纳税调整实施办法(试行)》对一般反避税条款实施的规定存在一定程度的矛盾和冲突,将极大地约束该条款在反避税实践中的适用。一般反避税条款所包含的商业目的要件和经济实质要件在当前立法中的关系如何,在实践中如何予以认定,是该条款获得实施的基础。 The general anti-avoidance rule introduced in the Enterprises Income Tax Act of the PRC (2008) will have great impacts on tax imposition. However, Section 47 of the Act, the Implementation regula-tions Of the Act later made and the Methods of Special Tax Adjustments contradict to some extent with the gen-eral anti-tax-avoidance rule, which will greatly impair the effects of the rule in practice. Thus, how to satisfy the requirements of business purpose and economic essence while applying the rule becomes a key issue to en-sure it to be smoothly implemented.
作者 汤洁茵
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期162-171,共10页 Modern Law Science
关键词 一般反避税条款 商业目的 经济实质 general anti-avoidance rule business purpose economic substance
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1陈晶晶.避税与反避税博弈进入拐点[N].法制日报,2007-08-29(09). 被引量:1
  • 2David A. Weisbach. Formalism in the Tax Law[J]. The University of Chicago Law Review, 1999,66 : 876. 被引量:1
  • 3Brian J. Arnold. The Canadian General Anti - A- voidance Rule [ G ]//Graeme S. Cooper. Tax Avoidance and the Rule of Law. Amsterdam : IBFD Publications, 1997 : 221 - 245. 被引量:1
  • 4Leif Muten. The Swedish Experiment with a General Anti- Avoidance Rule[ G]//Graeme S. Cooper. Tax Avoid- ance and the Rule of Law. Amsterdam: IBFD Publications, 1997 : 307 - 327. 被引量:1
  • 5Roy Rohatgi. Basic International Taxation [ M ]. Gra- ham & Trotman LTD: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,2002 : 356. 被引量:1
  • 6David P. Hariton. When and How Should the Eco- nomic Substance Doctrine Be Applied?[ J]. Tax Law Review, 2006,59(4) :53. 被引量:1
  • 7Michael L. Scheler. Ten More Truths about Tax Shelters : The Problem, Possible Solutions, and a Reply to Pro- fessor Weisbach [ J ]. Tax Law Review, 2002, ( 55 ) : 334 - 340. 被引量:1
  • 8Zachary Nahass. Codifing the Economic Substance Doctrine: A Proposal on the Doorstep of Usefulness [ J ]. Ad- ministrative Law Review,2006,58:258 - 260. 被引量:1
  • 9Yoram Keinan. The Many Faces of the Economic Substance' s Two - Prong Test, Time for Reconciliation? [ J ]. NYU Journal of Law and Business,2005, ( 1 ) :392 -394. 被引量:1
  • 10Jeff Rector. A Review of the Economic Substance Doctrine [ J ]. Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance, 2005, (10) : 179 - 183. 被引量:1

同被引文献648

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部