期刊文献+

股权激励与投资行为:以光明乳业为例 被引量:11

Equity Incentives and Investment Behavior:A Case Study of Bright Dairy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 投资决策是决定公司价值创造的重要因素之一,作为公司价值和经济增长的源泉,必然也受到管理层动机的影响。由所有权和经营权分离所导致的代理问题会影响高管人员的投资决策,导致公司过度投资或投资不足。由于投资对经理人兼具私人收益与私人成本,股权激励作为解决代理问题的一种长期激励方式,可能改变上述成本与收益的对比,其设计、实施是否合理会直接影响高管人员的行为,进而影响公司的投资行为。本文以光明乳业为例,分析股权激励如何影响国有上市公司的投资行为,并给出对策性建议。 Investment decisions are important determinants of a company's value creation. As the source of a company's value and economic growth, investment decisions are bound to be influenced by managers' motivation. Agency problems caused by the separation of ownership and management will affect managers' investment decisions, and lead to over-investment or inadequate investment. As investment has both private benefit and cost for managers, equity incentive may change the comparison of cost and benefit since it is a long-term incentive to solve agency problems. The reasonableness of these incentives' design and implement will influence managers' behavior directly and thereby affect the company's investment behavior. Taking the Bright Dairy as an example, we analyze how equity incentive will affect the investment behavior of state-owned listed companies. Some suggestions are given accordingly at last.
作者 李侠 沈小燕
出处 《上海立信会计学院学报》 北大核心 2012年第4期34-44,共11页 Journal of Shanghai Lixin University of Commerce
基金 教育部人文社科青年项目(11YJC630176) 国家自然科学基金项目(71072042)
关键词 股权激励 国有企业 投资行为 equity incentive state-owned company investment behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Smith C W.,R.L.Watts.The investment opportunityset and corporate financing,dividend and compensationpolicies[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1992,32(12):263-292. 被引量:1
  • 2Gaver J.,Gaver K.M.Additional evidence on theassociation between the investment opportunity set andcorporate financing,dividend and compensationpolicies[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,1993,16:125-160. 被引量:1
  • 3Agrawal Anup,Gershon N.Mandelker.Managerial in-centives and corporate investment and financing deci-sions[J].Journal of Finance,1987,42(4):823-837. 被引量:1
  • 4Core John,Jun Qian.Option-like contracts for innova-tion and production[R].Working Paper,Boston Col-lege,2000. 被引量:1
  • 5Prendergast C.What trade-off of risk and incentives?[J].American Economic Review,2000,90:421-425. 被引量:1
  • 6Prendergast C.The tenuous trade-off between risk andincentives[J].Journal of Political Economy,2002,110:1071-1102. 被引量:1
  • 7Lazear E.P.Output-based pay:incentives,retentionor sorting?[J].Research in Labor Economics,2004,23:1-25. 被引量:1
  • 8Oyer P.Why do firms use incentives that have no in-centive effects?[J].Journal of Finance,2004,59:1619-1649. 被引量:1
  • 9Oyer P.,Schaefer S.Why do some firms give stock op-tions to all employees?an empirical examination of al-ternative theories[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2005,76:99-133 被引量:1
  • 10Nagaoka S.Determinants of the introduction of stockoptions by Japanese firms:analysis from the incentiveand selection perspectives[J].Journal of Business,2005,78:2289-2315. 被引量:1

二级参考文献95

共引文献255

引证文献11

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部