期刊文献+

3T MR灌注参数(K^(trans))和扩散参数(ADC)在不同脑肿瘤的相关关系的初步研究 被引量:5

Pilot study on the correlation between 3-T MR perfusion and diffusion in brain tumors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估MR灌注参数(K^(trans))和扩散参数(ADC)在不同脑肿瘤的相关关系。方法回顾性研究13例脑肿瘤(男8例女5例平均年龄54.6±17.7岁,其中胶质母细胞瘤3例,低级别-间变性胶质瘤4例,脑膜瘤3例,转移瘤3例。所有患者均行T_1WI动态对比增强MR灌注和扩散成像(Magnetom Trio,A Tim System 3.0 T,Siemens)。对每个病例,在相应的K^(trans)和ADC图上选取兴趣区。记录所有兴趣区的K^(trans)和ADC的最大值(max),平均值(mean),最小值(min),并进行Pearson相关分析。结果 K^(trans)(max)与ADC(min)及ADC(mean)呈明显负相关,Pearson相关系数分别为(r=-0.536,P<0.001)(r=-0.465,P<0.001)。K^(trans)(mean)与ADC(mean)呈明显负相关(r=-0.228,P=0.038)。K^(trans)(min)亦与ADC(max)呈明显负相关(r=-0.355,P<0.001)。结论不论脑肿瘤的类型,ADC值与K^(trans)值始终呈负相关,这些发现说明微血管渗透性、肿瘤微环境等因素,可能调节和/或影响肿瘤细胞数量、缺血性损伤及复杂的细胞外环境变化。 Objective To assess the correlation between volume transfer constant (K^trans) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of various brain tumors on 3T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Methods Thirteen patients (8 men, 5 women; mean age 54.6±17.7 years) with brain tumors underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced Tl-weighted perfusion and diffusion-weighted imaging using a 3T MR system. The tumors were histologically confirmed including glioblastoma multiforme (3), low-grade to anaplastic gliomas (4), meningiomas (3) and metastases (3). K^trans was estimated using specially designed software. For each tumor, regions of interest (ROIs) were manually selected on corresponding K^trans and ADC maps. Pearson correlation coefficients were obtained for maximum, mean and minimum values of Ktrans and ADC of all ROIs. Results K^trans (max) values were significantly inversely correlated with ADC (min) values (r=-0.536, P〈 0.001) and ADC (mean) values (r=-0.465,P〈0.001). K^trans (mean) and K^trans (rain) values were significantly inversely correlated with ADC (mean) (r=-0.228, P=0.038) and ADC (max) values (r=-0.355, P〈0.001), respectively. Conclusion Irrespective of brain tumor type, there is an inverse correlation between ADC and K^trans. The relationship between vascular permeability and tumor microenvironment reflects changes including increased cellularity, isehemic insult and varying extraeellular matrix composition.
出处 《影像诊断与介入放射学》 2012年第4期247-250,共4页 Diagnostic Imaging & Interventional Radiology
关键词 动态对比增强MRI 扩散加权成像 脑肿瘤 表观扩散系数 渗透性 血脑屏障 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Diffusion-weighted imaging Brain tumor Apparent diffusioncoefficient Permeability Blood-brain barrier
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Louis DN. Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol, 2007,14: 97-1119. 被引量:1
  • 2Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB, et al. Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumors: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. Eur J Cancer, 1996, 32 : 2,174-24.84. 被引量:1
  • 3Lacerda S, Law M. Magnetic resonance perfusion and permeability imaging in brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin North Am, 2009, 19: 527-557. 被引量:1
  • 4Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Brasch RC, Dillon WP. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging : correlation with histologic grade. Am J Neuroradiol, 2000, 21 : 891-899. 被引量:1
  • 5Law M. Yang S, Babb JS. et al. Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with the glioma grade. Am J Neuroradiol, 2004, 25: 746-755. 被引量:1
  • 6Johnson G, Wetzel SG. Cha S, et al. Measuring blood volume and vascular transfer of constant from dynamic, T2^*-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2004. ;31:961-968. 被引量:1
  • 7Cha S. Yang L, Johnson G. et al. Comparison of microvascular permeability measurements, k^trans, determined with conventional steady-state T1-weighted and first-pass T2^* -weighted MR imaging methods in gliomas and meningiomas. Am J Neuroradiol, 2006, 27: 409-417. 被引量:1
  • 8Larsson HBW, Courivaud F, Rostrup E, et al. Measurement of brain perfusion, blood volume, and blood brain barrier pemaeability, using dynamic contrast enhanced T1 weighted MRI at 3 tesla. Magn Reson Med, 2009,62: 1270-1281. 被引量:1
  • 9Guo AC, Cummings TJ, Dash RC, et al. Lymphomas and high- grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. Radiology, 2002. 224 : 177-183. 被引量:1
  • 10Tofts PS. Brix G, Buckley DL, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced Tt-weighted MRI of a diffusible tracer: standardized quantifies and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1999,10: 223-232. 被引量:1

同被引文献48

  • 1宋莉,王霄英,谢晟,肖江喜,蒋学祥.DWI以及ADC值测量在脑肿瘤鉴别诊断中的价值[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(3):354-357. 被引量:27
  • 2Shin JH, Lee HK, Kwun BD, et al. Using relative cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the histopathologie grade of cerebral gliomas : preliminary results[J].AJ R, 2002,179 (3) : 783-789. 被引量:1
  • 3Franiel T, Hamm B, Hricak H. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mag- netic resonance imaging and pharmaeokinetic models in prostate cancer[J]. Eur Radiol,2011,21(3) :616-626. 被引量:1
  • 4Kim J H, Lee J M, Park J H, et al. Solid pancreatic lesions : charac terization by using timing bolus dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging assessment a preliminary study[J]. Radiology, 2013, 266(1) :185-196. 被引量:1
  • 5de Langen AJ, van den Boogaart V, Lubberink M, et al. Monito- ring response to antiangiogenic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer using imaging markers derived from PET and dynamic con trast-enhanced MRI[J]. J Nucl Med, 2011,52 ( 1 ) : 48- 55. 被引量:1
  • 6Patankar TF, Haroon HA, Mills SJ, et al. Is volume transfer coef- ficient (Ktrans) related to histologic grade in human gliomas[J]. AJNR,2005,26(10) :2455-2465. 被引量:1
  • 7Mills SJ,Patankar TA, Haroon HA,et al. Do cerebral blood vol- ume and contrast transfer coefficient predict prognosis in human glioma[J]. AJNR,2006,27(4) :853-858. 被引量:1
  • 8Zhang N,Zhang L, Qiu B, et al. Correlation of volume transfer coefficient Ktrans with histopathologic grades of gliomas[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2012,36(2) :355-363. 被引量:1
  • 9Yankeelov TE, DeBusk LM, Billheimer DD, el al. Repeatability of a reference region model for analysis of murine DCE-MR1 data at 7T[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2006,24(5) :1140-1147. 被引量:1
  • 10Yankeelov TE, Cron GO, Addison CL, et al. Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an A1F in the analysis of DCE-MRI data[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2007,57 (2) : 353-361. 被引量:1

引证文献5

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部