期刊文献+

根治性调强放疗宫颈癌不同治疗模式的急性反应研究 被引量:7

Change in pattern of radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析调强放疗宫颈癌不同治疗模式改变及缩短总治疗时间的可行性及急性反应差异。方法 107例根治性放疗宫颈癌患者,外照射用三维适形放疗(three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy,3D-CRT)37例、常规调强放疗(intensity-modulated radiotherapy,IMRT)26例和螺旋断层放疗(helical tomotherapy,HT)44例。3D-CRT外照射40Gy/4周后加后装放疗,1次/周,总治疗时间9-10周;IMRT和HT组外照射3周后加后装放疗,2次/周,总治疗时间为6-7周;后装放疗均为6-7次。结果放疗期间膀胱Ⅰ级反应发生率在3D-CRT组、IMRT组和HT组分别为56.76%、23.08%和18.18%,3D-CRT与其他两组之间有统计学差异(χ2=6.13,P<0.05);直肠Ⅰ级反应发生率分别为86.49%、53.85%和29.55%,各组之间均有统计学差异(χ2=10.37,P<0.01)。结论外照射采用常规IMRT和HT技术根治性放疗宫颈癌比3D-CRT缩短治疗时间2-3周,且放疗反应明显降低。 Objective To retrospectively analyze the feasibility to change the pattern of radical cervical cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) for cervical cancer and shorten its treatment time. Methods Of the 107 patients with cervical cancer, 37 received 3D conformal radiation therapy(3D-CRT), 26 received conventional IMRT and 44 underwent helical tomotherapy(HT). After external irradiation at 40Gy for 4 weeks, patients in 3D-CRT group received loading brachytherapy, once a week, for 9-10 weeks. Patients in IMRT and HT groups received loading brachytherapy 3 weeks after external irradiation, twice a week, for 6-7 weeks. Results The incidence of grade 1 acute side effects in bladder and rectum of 3 groups was 56.76%, 23.08% and 18.18%, respectively( X^2=6-13, P〈0.05) and 86.49%, 53.85% and 29.55%, respectively( X^2=10.37, P〈0.01). Conclusion IMRT and HT can shorten 2-3 weeks of radical cervical cancer treatment time with a low incidence of side effects.
出处 《军医进修学院学报》 CAS 2012年第9期910-912,共3页 Academic Journal of Pla Postgraduate Medical School
关键词 三维适形放疗 调强放疗 螺旋断层放疗 放疗模式 3D-CRT intensity modulated radiation therapy helical tomotherapy radiotherapy pattern
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献51

  • 1Lee N, Puri DR, Blanco AI, et al. Intensity-Modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: an update. Head Neck,2007, 29:387-400. 被引量:1
  • 2Mackie TR, Holmes T, Swerdloff S, et al. Tomotherapy : a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy. Med Phys, 1993,20 : 1709-1719. 被引量:1
  • 3Van Vulpen M, Field C, Raaijmakers CP, et al. Comparing stepand-shoot IMRT with dynamic helical Tomotherapy IMRT plans for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005,62: 1535-1539. 被引量:1
  • 4Sheng K, Molloy JA, Read PW. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,65: 917-923. 被引量:1
  • 5Hart C, Liu A, Schultheiss TE, et al. Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy treatment plans and step-and-shoot intensitymodulated radiosurgery treatment plans in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,65: 608-616. 被引量:1
  • 6Sheng K,Molloy JA,Larnera JM,et al. A dosimetric comparison of non-coplanar IMRT versus Helical Tomotherapy for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer. Radiother Oncol,2007,82 : 174-178. 被引量:1
  • 7Wang X,Zhang X,Dong L,et al. Effectiveness of noncoplanar IMRT planning using a parallelized multiresolution beam angle optimization method for paranasal sinus carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ,2005,63:594-601. 被引量:1
  • 8Cozzi L, Fogliata A, Bolsi A, et al. Three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer patients: comparative analysis of dosimetric and technical parameters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2004,58:617-624. 被引量:1
  • 9Fiorino C, Dell'Oca I, Pierelli A, et al. Simultaneous integrated boost( SIB ) for nasopharynx cancer with helical tomotherapy. A planning study. Strahlenther Onko1,2007 ,183 :497-505. 被引量:1
  • 10Amosson CM,Teh BS,Mai WY,et al. Using technology to decrease xerostomia for head and neck cancer patientstreated with radiation therapy. Semin Oncol,2002,29:71-79. 被引量:1

共引文献77

同被引文献42

引证文献7

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部