期刊文献+

基于Bayes估计的民航维修人为差错评估技术研究 被引量:4

The Research on Bayesian Estimation of Human Error Probability Evaluation for Civil Aviation Maintenance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究了基于Bayes估计的民航维修人为差错评估技术。首先,将维修人为差错概率视为随机变量,利用航空公司积累的历史信息作为先验数据,以THERP手册提供的5%分位点作为维修人为差错概率中值,运用点估计法确定维修人为差错的先验分布模型。其次,给出了Bayes先验分布参数的求解方法。最后,选取验后Beta分布的中值作为θ的贝叶斯估计,构建了民航人为维修差错概率计算方法。通过实例分析,可以看出随着维修次数的增多,维修人为差错概率就越接近于极大似然法估计的失效概率。现场数据的检验反映了该评估方法的有效性、精确性和实用性。 This paper focuses on the human error evaluation method in civil aviation maintenance based on the Bayesian estimation theory. First of all, taking the maintenance human error probability as a random variables, meanwhile using the airline historical data as a priori information, using the 5% sites provided by the THERP Handbook as the mean probability value of maintenance human error, to determine the prior distribution model of human error using the point estimation method. Secondly, solving estiamtion method for Bayes prior distribution pa- rameters is presented. Finally, the median posterior Beta distribution is taken as 0' s Bayesian estimation, to con- struct the human error probability calculation method for civil aviation maintenance. Through the example analysis on the field data, it shows that as the increase of the number of maintenance, human error probability is closer to the maximum likelihood estimation method of the failure probability. The results of case study shows the, effectiveness, accuracy and practicability of the proposed method in this paper.
出处 《科学技术与工程》 北大核心 2012年第22期5689-5692,共4页 Science Technology and Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会与中国民用航空局联合项目(61179058) 南京航空航天大学基本科研业务费专项科研项目(NS2010182)资助
关键词 维修人为差错概率 贝叶斯方法 点估计 现场数据 maintenance human error probability bayesian method point estimation field data
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1大新华航空技术有限公司安全管理办公室.2000年~2009年国内民航维修人为差错案例集,2010. 被引量:1
  • 2中国民航总局民航安全办公室.中国民航安全报告(2005).北京:中国民航总局,2006. 被引量:1
  • 3人为因素总数据库课题组.人为因素总数据库研究报告.天津:中国民航学院民航安全科学研究所,2003. 被引量:1
  • 4蒋英杰,孙志强,谢红卫,宫二玲.人为差错概率量化方法综述[J].科技导报,2011,29(5):74-79. 被引量:11
  • 5Swain A D, Guttmann H E. Handbook of human reliability analys is with emphasis on nuclear power plant application. NUREG/ CR- 1278, 1983. 被引量:1
  • 6Hanaman G W, Spurgin A J, Lukic Y. Human cognitive reliability model for PRA analysis (NIJS-4531). Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute, 1984. 被引量:1
  • 7Embrey D E. SLIM -MAUl): An approach to assessing human error probabilities using structured expert judgment (NUREG/CR- 3518). Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983. 被引量:1
  • 8Strater O. Consideration on the elements of quantifying human relia- bility. Reliability Engineering and Sy- stem Safety, 2004; 83 (2): 255-264. 被引量:1
  • 9Bayes T. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Phil Trans Roy Soc London, 1736 ;53:370-418. 被引量:1
  • 10蔡洪,张士峰,张金槐著..Bayes试验分析与评估[M].长沙:国防科技大学出版社,2004:371.

二级参考文献52

  • 1何旭洪,童节娟,黄祥瑞.低功率和停堆工况下人员可靠性分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2005,15(4):93-96. 被引量:4
  • 2何旭洪,童节娟,黄祥瑞.Bayes方法在人误概率估计中的应用[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(6):843-845. 被引量:2
  • 3刘海滨,何旭洪,申世飞,童节娟.人员可靠性分析中人误概率数据的修正[J].核动力工程,2006,27(3):53-56. 被引量:3
  • 4Swain A D, Guttmann H E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications (NUREG/CR-1278)[R]. Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983. 被引量:1
  • 5Swain A D Accident sequence evaluation program human reliability analysis procedure (NUREG/CR-4772)[R]. Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1987. 被引量:1
  • 6Hanaman G W, Spurgin A J, Lukic Y. Human cognitive reliability model for PRA analysis (NUS-4531)[R]. Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute, 1984. 被引量:1
  • 7Williams J C. A data-based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance [C]. IEEE 4th Coifferenee on Human Factor and Power Plants, Monterey, CA, USA, Jun5-9, 1988: 436-453. 被引量:1
  • 8Embrey D E. SLIM-MAUD: An approach to assessing human error probabilities using structured expert judgment (NUREG/CR -3518) [R]. Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983. 被引量:1
  • 9Barriere M. Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a techniques for human event analysis (ATHEANA) (NUREG-1624)[R]. Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2000. 被引量:1
  • 10Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) [M]. Ixmdon: Elsevier Science Ltd, 1998. 被引量:1

共引文献28

同被引文献40

  • 1高扬,宫一民.飞行机组人为差错风险分析方法研究[J].工业工程,2014,17(1):1-6. 被引量:7
  • 2李骁骅,王晶禹.LPG储罐的失效原因分析[J].工业安全与环保,2007,33(6):44-46. 被引量:6
  • 3BP. Fatal Accident Investigation Report [ R ]. Interim Report, Texas City, Texas, 2005. 被引量:1
  • 4KHAN F I, HADDARA M R. Risk - based Mainte- nance of Ethylene Oxide Production Facilities [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004, ( 3 ) : 147 - 159. 被引量:1
  • 5KHAN F I, SADIP R, HUSAIN T. Risk Based Process Safety Assessment and Control Measures Design for Offshore Process Facilities [ J ]. Journal of Hazardous Materials ,2002, (94) : 1 - 36. 被引量:1
  • 6SWAMINATHAN S, SMIDTS C. The Event Sequence Diagram Framework for Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment [ J ]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1999,63 ( 1 ) :73 - 90. 被引量:1
  • 7BUCCI P, KISCHENBAUM J, MANGAN A L, et al. Construction of Event - tree/Fault - tree Models from a Markov~ Approach to Dynamic System Reliability [ J ]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2008, 93 ( 11 ) : 1616 - 1627. 被引量:1
  • 8BOUDALI H, DUGAN J B. A Discrete - time Bayes- ian Network Reliability Modeling and Analysis Frame- work[ J 1. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2005,87 ( 3 ) :337 - 349. 被引量:1
  • 9MEEL A, SEIDER W D. Plant Specific Dynamic Fail- ure Assessment using Bayesian Theory [ J ]. Chemical Engineering Science,2006,61 : 7036 - 7056. 被引量:1
  • 10MEEL A, O'NEILL L M, LEVIN J H, et al. Opera- tional Risk Assessment of Chemical Industries by Ex- ploiting Accident Database [ J ]. Journal of Loss Pre- vention,2007,20 : 113 - 127. 被引量:1

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部