期刊文献+

网络Meta分析在R软件中的实现 被引量:11

Network MetaAnalysis and Its Solution by R
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的介绍网络Meta分析方法及其在R软件的实现。方法以实例说明,采用R软件lme()函数,通过对来自5个预防人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者发生复合鸟分支杆菌感染事件随机对照研究的3种药物和安慰剂进行直接和间接比较,进行网络Meta分析。结果直接和间接比较结果表明,所有药物较之于安慰剂均可以减少人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者出现复合鸟分支杆菌事件发生,克拉霉素和阿奇霉素较之于利福平均可以减少人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者出现复合鸟分支杆菌事件发生;而对无直接比较证据的克拉霉素与阿奇霉素,间接比较结果显示两者差异无统计学意义。结论合并多个干预措施效果和没有所有干预措施直接比较证据时,采用网络Meta分析方法合并直接和间接比较结果是一种正规的方法。 Objective To introduce methodology for undertaking a network meta-analysis and its realization in R. Methods By using 1me () function in R, network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was used to combine direct and indirect estimates of the effect of three drugs and placebo for mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from 5 RCTs. Results All drugs differed from placebo in reducing MAC events from the results of direct and indirect comparisons. Clarithromycin and Azithromyein differed from Rifabutin in reducing MAC events from the results of direct and indirect comparisons respectively. The indirect efficacy of Clarithromycin and Azithromycin had no significance in statistically. Conclusions A network meta-analysis can be used to combine direct and indirect treatment effects in a formal when several treatments are available and not all treatments have been compared directly in some two-armed RCTs.
作者 张天嵩 熊茜
出处 《循证医学》 CSCD 2012年第3期185-188,共4页 The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
关键词 网络Meta分析 线性混合效应模型 间接比较 R软件 network meta-analysis linear mixed-effects model indirect comparisons R
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Thijs V, Lemmens R, Fieuws S. Network meta-analysis: Simultaneous meta-analysis of common antiplatelet regimens after transient ischaemic attack or stroke [J]. Eur Heart J, 2008,29(9) : 1086-1092. 被引量:1
  • 2Lumley T. Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons [ J ]. Star Med, 2002,21 ( 16 ) : 2313-2324. 被引量:1
  • 3Chu J, Sloan CE, Freedberg KA, et al. Drug efficacy by direct and adjusted indirect comparison to placebo: An illustration by Mycobacterium avium complex prophylaxis in HIV[J]. AIDS Res Ther, 2011,8: 14. 被引量:1
  • 4Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence-indirectness [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011,64 ( 12 ) : 1303-1310. 被引量:1
  • 5Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook tor Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011 ]. http ://www.cochrane-handbook. org. 被引量:1
  • 6Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons [J ]. Stat Med, 2004,23 (20) : 3105-3124. 被引量:1
  • 7Pinheiro J , Bates D, DebRoy S, et al. Package 'nlme'.cran. r-project.org/web /packages/nlme/nlme.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 8Song F, Lake YK, Walsh T, et al. Methodological pmhlems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare intmwentions: Survey of published systematic reviews [J]. BMJ, 2009,338 : b1147. 被引量:1

同被引文献173

  • 1Song F,Altman DG,Glenny AM,ei al. Validity of indirect comparisonfor estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidencefrom published meta-analyses [J]. BMJ,2003,326(7387):472. 被引量:1
  • 2Glenny AM,Altman DG,Song F,et al. Indirect comparisons ofcompeting interventions [J]. Health Technol Assess,2005,9(26):1-134,iii-iv. 被引量:1
  • 3Song F,Loke YK,Walsh T,et al. Methodological problems in the use ofindirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: surveyof published systematic reviews [J]. BMJ,2009,338:b 1147. 被引量:1
  • 4Song F,Harvey I,Lilford R. Adjusted indirect comparison may be lessbiased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceuticalinterventions [J]. J Clin Epidemiol,2008,61 (5):455-463. 被引量:1
  • 5Berlie HD’Kalus JS’Jaber LA. Thiazolidinediones and therisk of edema: a meta-analysis [J], Diabetes Res ClinPract,2007,76(2):279-89. 被引量:1
  • 6Boonen S,Lips F,Bouillon K,et al. Need for additional calcium toreduce the risk of hip fracture with vitamin d supplementation:evidence from a comparative metaanalysis of randomized controlledtrials [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2007,92(4):1415-23. 被引量:1
  • 7Bucher HC,Guyatt GH,Griffith LE,et al. The results of direct andindirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomizedcontrolled trials [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1997,50(6):683-91. 被引量:1
  • 8Lumley T. Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons[J]. Stat Med,2002,21(16):2313-24. 被引量:1
  • 9Van Valkenhoef G,Tervonen T,Zwinkels T,et al. ADDIS: a decisionsupport system for evidence-based medicine [J]. Decis SupportSyst,2012,in press. 被引量:1
  • 10Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff ),et al. Preferred reporting items forsystematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement[J]. JClin Epidemiol,2009,62(10):1006-12. 被引量:1

引证文献11

二级引证文献203

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部