期刊文献+

两种细胞学检查联合HPV检测筛查宫颈癌及癌前病变的临床对比分析 被引量:7

Clinical comparison and analysis on two kinds of cytological test combined with HPV detection in screening of cervical cancer and cervical precancerous lesion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析液基薄层细胞学检查(TCT)联合HPV检测和巴氏涂片检查联合HPV检测筛查早期宫颈癌和癌前病变的效果。方法:选择妇科体检的1 012例女性随机分成两组:TCT组500例实施液基薄层联合HPV检测;巴氏涂片检查组512例进行巴氏涂片检查联合HPV检测,比较两种方法对于宫颈异常的检出率,两种方法都以病理检查为标准。结果:TCT组特异性为79.22%、敏感性为92.87%、假阴性率为0.20%;巴氏涂片组特异性为98.24%、敏感性为56.24%、假阴性率为1.97%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。阳性检出率TCT组为3.40%,巴氏涂片组为2.73%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在宫颈癌和癌前病变诊断中,TCT检查联合HPV检测优于巴氏涂片检查联合HPV检测,其筛查的假阴性率较低,敏感性较高,可以作为一种先进的筛查方法。 Objective: To compare and analyze the effects of liquid -based thin layer cytological test (TCT) combined with human papillomavirus (HPV) detection and Papanicolaou test combined with HPV detection in early screening of cervical cancer and cervical precancerous lesion. Methods: A total of 1 012 women receiving gynecological examination were randomly divided into two groups: 500 women in TCT group adopted TCT combined with HPV detection; 512 women in Papanicolaou test group adopted Papanicolaou test combined with HPV detection. The detection rates of cervical abnormality by the two methods were compared, pathological examination was designed as gold standard. Results: The specificity, sensitivity, and false negative rate in TCT group were 79.22% , 92. 87%, and 0. 20%, respectively. The specificity, sensitivity, and false negative rate in Papanicolaou test group were 98.24% , 56. 24% , and 1.97% , respectively. The posi- tive detection rate in TCT group was 3.40% , and the positive detection rate in Papanicolaou test group was 2. 73% , there was no significant difference between TCT group and Papanicolaou test group (P 〉 0. 05 ) . Conclusion : For diagnosis of cervical cancer and cervical precan- cerous lesion, TCT compared with HPV detection are superior to Papanicolaou test combined with HPV detection, the false negative rate of the former is low, the sensitivity is high, which can be used as an advanced screening method.
作者 陈颢研
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第16期2558-2560,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 宫颈癌 液基薄层细胞学检查 巴氏涂片检查 人乳头状瘤病毒 Cervical cancer Liquid -based thin layer cytological test Papanicolaou test Human papillomavirus
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献74

共引文献62

同被引文献49

  • 1廖秦平,赵健,陈锐.HPV感染的处理原则及HPV检测与随访[J].实用妇产科杂志,2010,26(3):172-174. 被引量:12
  • 2郎景和.子宫颈癌及其普查[J].现代妇产科进展,1994,3(3):275-278. 被引量:73
  • 3邹倩,濮德敏.液基超薄细胞检测结合TBS系统检测1583例宫颈涂片的临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(4):480-482. 被引量:11
  • 4谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:118-119. 被引量:1253
  • 5Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, et al. Efficacy of human papil- lomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet Oncol,2010,11 (3):249-257. 被引量:1
  • 6Steben M,Duarte-Franco E. Human papillomavirus infection: epi- demiology and pathophysiology [ J ]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2007, 107(2 Suppl 1 ):$2- $5. 被引量:1
  • 7Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, et al. Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in :condary preventior: of cervical cancer [ J ]. Vaccine ,2012,30 ( Suppl 5 ) : F88 - F99. 被引量:1
  • 8Szarewski A, Mesher D, Cadman L, et al. Comparison of seven tests for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with ab- normal smears: the Predictors 2 study[ J]. J Clin Microbiol,2012, 50(6) :1867 - 1873. 被引量:1
  • 9Karimi-Zarchi M, Peighmbari F, Karimi N, et al. A comparison of 3 ways of conventional pap smear, liquid - based cytology and col- poscopy vs cervical biopsy for early diagnosis of premalignant le- sions or cervical cancer in women with abnormal conventional pap test[ J:. lnt J Biomed Sci,2013,9(4) :205 -210. 被引量:1
  • 10Cuzick J,Cadman L, Mesher D, et al. Comparing the performance of six human papillomavirus tests in a screening population [ J ]. Br J Cancer,2013,108(4) :908 -913. 被引量:1

引证文献7

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部